Al Jebaje Zaid, Jabri Ahmad, Mishra Tushar, Halboni Adnan, Ayyad Asem, Alameh Anas, Ellauzi Rama, Alexandrino Francisco B, Alaswad Khaldoon, Basir Mir Babar
Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jan-Feb;88:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
As the field of percutaneous coronary intervention grows in volume, expertise, and available tools, interventional cardiologists are increasingly performing more complex and higher-risk coronary artery procedures. Mechanical circulatory support devices, previously used only in urgent situations, are now being utilized as supplementary tools to enhance outcomes in elective complex cases. This shift has sparked significant discussions about patient and device selection, as well as the potential risks involved. In this article, we explore the various devices and their distinct features. Additionally, we also introduce algorithms for device selection, placement and weaning to help guide physicians during their care for their high-risk PCI patients.
随着经皮冠状动脉介入治疗领域在手术量、专业技术以及可用工具方面不断发展,介入心脏病学家越来越多地开展更为复杂、风险更高的冠状动脉手术。机械循环支持设备此前仅在紧急情况下使用,如今正被用作辅助工具,以改善择期复杂病例的治疗效果。这种转变引发了关于患者和设备选择以及潜在风险的大量讨论。在本文中,我们探讨了各种设备及其独特特性。此外,我们还介绍了设备选择、置入和撤机的算法,以帮助指导医生在治疗高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者时做出决策。