Suppr超能文献

比较两种立体定向脑活检方法(旋切钻与颅钻开颅术)的诊断率、手术时间和术后出血。

Comparison of diagnostic yields, operative times, and post-operative hemorrhage between twist drill versus burr hole craniotomy approaches for stereotactic needle brain biopsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 25;47(1):819. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03015-6.

Abstract

Stereotactic frameless needle brain biopsy is a common neurosurgical procedure performed via twist drill or open burr hole approaches. We aim to compare diagnostic yields and surgical outcomes to delineate the safety and efficacy of both approaches. A retrospective database of all stereotactic needle biopsy procedures performed at a single institution over 30 months was conglomerated. Demographics, medical comorbidities, operative details/complications, immediate post-operative imaging, and pathology were abstracted. Two hundred and twenty-five needle biopsies were identified, of which 165 (73.3%) were open, and 60 (26.7%) were twist drill. Diagnostic pathology yield rates between open (84.8%) and twist drill (93.3%) approaches were similar (p = 0.15), with a median of 4 cores taken in each (p = 0.30). Diagnostic tissue yields with an intra-operative pause for pathology confirmation was 90.4% compared to 79.1% without pause (p = 0.036, OR 2.49). Median operative times for open versus twist drill procedures were 68.0 min (IQR 49-83) versus 35.5 min (IQR 26-54), respectively (Wilcoxon p < 0.001), which remained significant after controlling for awaiting intraoperative pathology using bivariable linear modeling (p < 0.001). Intraoperative bleeding through the needle cannula was noted in 22 patients (9.8%), including eight twist drill (13.3%) and 14 open needles (8.5%). Of 197 cases (87.6%) with post-operative cranial imaging (CT/MRI), 90 (45.7%) demonstrated some degree of post-operative hemorrhage characterized as superficial (n = 10, 11.1%), deep/intralesional (n = 64, 71.1%) bleeding, or both (n = 16, 17.9%). Bleeding rates between open (46.7%) and twist drill (43.3%) approaches were similar (p = 0.78). Post-operative clinical decline or neurological change was noted in 9 patients (4.0%), including one twist drill (1.7%) and eight open needles (4.8%), among which 7 (78%) had deep blood products identified on post-operative imaging. Stereotactic needle biopsy via twist drill approach has similar diagnostic yield rates, asymptomatic bleeding rates, and post-operative complications with significantly shorter operative time and smaller incision size than conventional open burr hole needle biopsy. Using intra-operative frozen histopathology for presumed sufficient diagnostic tissue may improve final pathologic diagnostic rates regardless of approach technique.

摘要

立体定向无框架针脑活检是一种常见的神经外科手术,通过旋转钻头或开颅钻方法进行。我们旨在比较诊断率和手术结果,以阐明这两种方法的安全性和有效性。对一家机构 30 个月内进行的所有立体定向针活检手术的回顾性数据库进行了汇总。提取人口统计学、合并症、手术细节/并发症、术后即刻影像学和病理结果。确定了 225 例针活检,其中 165 例(73.3%)为开放式,60 例(26.7%)为旋转钻头式。开放式(84.8%)和旋转钻头式(93.3%)方法的诊断病理检出率相似(p=0.15),每个方法平均取 4 个核心(p=0.30)。在进行术中病理确认时暂停手术,诊断组织产量为 90.4%,而不停顿手术为 79.1%(p=0.036,OR 2.49)。与开放式手术相比,旋转钻头手术的中位手术时间分别为 68.0 分钟(IQR 49-83)和 35.5 分钟(IQR 26-54)(Wilcoxon p<0.001),在使用双变量线性模型控制术中等待病理结果后,差异仍然显著(p<0.001)。22 例患者(9.8%)术中经针套管出血,其中 8 例为旋转钻头(13.3%),14 例为开放式(8.5%)。197 例(87.6%)术后行头颅 CT/MRI 检查,90 例(45.7%)有不同程度的术后出血,表现为浅表(n=10,11.1%)、深部/瘤内(n=64,71.1%)出血或两者兼有(n=16,17.9%)。开放式(46.7%)和旋转钻头(43.3%)方法的出血率相似(p=0.78)。9 例(4.0%)患者术后出现临床恶化或神经功能改变,其中 1 例为旋转钻头(1.7%),8 例为开放式(4.8%),其中 7 例(78%)术后影像学显示深部有血液产物。与传统开颅钻针活检相比,立体定向旋转钻头针活检具有相似的诊断率、无症状性出血率和术后并发症,手术时间更短,切口更小。术中使用冷冻组织病理学检查以获得足够的诊断组织,无论采用何种方法,都可能提高最终的病理诊断率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验