Liu Chunlin, Huang Chungui
Technol Health Care. 2025;33(1):115-125. doi: 10.3233/THC-240602.
The incidence of posterior malleolus fractures in ankle fractures ranges from 7% to 44%. Studies have indicated a poorer prognosis for ankle joint function when a posterior malleolar fracture is present, underscoring the significance of active intervention for optimal postoperative ankle function recovery. Hence, the selection of treatment for such fractures holds particular importance.
Screw fixation is a key treatment for posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) or Haraguchi Type 1 fractures involving less than 25% of the distal tibia's articular surface. However, the optimal screw placement direction - anteroposterior (AP) or posterior-anterior (PA) - remains debated. This meta-analysis aims to compare these two approaches for treating posterior ankle fractures, focusing on the efficacy of PA fixation.
We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, SinoMed, and Web of Science databases from their inception to October 20, 2022. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing bias risk in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Stata MP17 software was used to compare the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, full weight-bearing time, and fracture healing time at the last follow-up between the two fixation methods.
A total of 403 patients with posterior malleolar fractures from six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher AOFAS score at the last follow-up for PA placement compared to AP placement [SMD = 0.512, 95% CI (0.244 to 0.780), z= 3.74, P< 0.001]. Postoperative full weight-bearing time and fracture healing time did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups.
PA fixation demonstrated a superior AOFAS score compared to AP fixation for posterior malleolar fractures. PA screw placement offers advantages in restoring ankle joint stability and enhancing joint function recovery post-surgery.
踝关节骨折中后踝骨折的发生率在7%至44%之间。研究表明,存在后踝骨折时踝关节功能的预后较差,这凸显了积极干预以实现最佳术后踝关节功能恢复的重要性。因此,此类骨折治疗方法的选择尤为重要。
螺钉固定是治疗后踝骨折(PMF)或累及胫骨远端关节面不到25%的原口型1骨折的关键治疗方法。然而,最佳的螺钉置入方向——前后位(AP)还是后前位(PA)——仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在比较这两种治疗后踝骨折的方法,重点关注PA固定的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库和Web of Science数据库,检索时间从各数据库建库至2022年10月20日。使用Cochrane协作网评估随机对照试验(RCT)偏倚风险的工具评估方法学质量。使用Stata MP17软件比较两种固定方法在末次随访时的美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝后足评分、完全负重时间和骨折愈合时间。
六项RCT中的403例后踝骨折患者符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与AP置入相比,PA置入在末次随访时的AOFAS评分更高[标准化均数差(SMD)=0.512,95%置信区间(CI)(0.244至0.780),z=3.74,P<0.001]。两组术后完全负重时间和骨折愈合时间差异无统计学意义。
对于后踝骨折,PA固定的AOFAS评分优于AP固定。PA螺钉置入在恢复踝关节稳定性和促进术后关节功能恢复方面具有优势。