Wellington Nathan J, Boucas Ana P, Lagopoulos Jim, Kuballa Anna V
National PTSD Research Centre, Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast (UniSC), Birtinya, Australia.
School of Health, UniSC, Sippy Downs, Australia.
J Neurogenet. 2024 Sep;38(3):79-101. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2024.2419098. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Molecular studies identifying alterations associated with PTSD have predominantly focused on candidate genes or conducted genome-wide analyses, often encountering issues with replicability. This review aims to identify robust bi-directional epigenetic and microRNA (miRNA) regulators focusing on their functional impacts on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their utility in clinical diagnosis, whilst examining knowledge gaps in the existing research. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health (CABI), and PubMed, augmented by grey literature, yielding 3465 potential articles. Ultimately, 92 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed to pinpoint significant epigenetic changes with clinically relevant potential in PTSD. The selected studies explored histone modifications, CpG sites, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and miRNA biomarkers. Specifically, nine studies examined epigenetic markers, detailing the influence of methylation on chromatin accessibility at histone positions H3K4, H3K9, and H3K36 within a PTSD context. Seventy-three studies investigated DNA methylation, identifying 20 hypermethylated and five hypomethylated CpG islands consistently observed in PTSD participants. Nineteen studies linked 88 SNPs to PTSD, with only one SNP replicated within these studies. Furthermore, sixteen studies focused on miRNAs, with findings indicating 194 downregulated and 24 upregulated miRNAs were associated with PTSD. Although there are epigenetic mechanisms that are significantly affected by PTSD, a granular deconstruction of these mechanisms elucidates the need to incorporate more nuanced approaches to identifying the factors that contribute to PTSD. Technological advances in diagnostic tools are driving the need to integrate detailed participant characteristics, trauma type, genetic susceptibilities, and best practices for robust reporting. This comprehensive approach will be crucial for enhancing the translational potential of PTSD research for clinical application.
识别与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)相关改变的分子研究主要集中在候选基因或进行全基因组分析,常常遇到可重复性问题。本综述旨在识别强有力的双向表观遗传和微小RNA(miRNA)调节因子,重点关注它们对创伤后应激障碍的功能影响及其在临床诊断中的效用,同时审视现有研究中的知识空白。我们在多个数据库中进行了系统检索,包括科学网、Scopus、全球健康(CABI)和PubMed,并辅以灰色文献,共获得3465篇潜在文章。最终,92项研究符合纳入标准并进行了分析,以确定创伤后应激障碍中具有临床相关潜力的显著表观遗传变化。所选研究探讨了组蛋白修饰、CpG位点、单核苷酸多态性(SNP)和miRNA生物标志物。具体而言,9项研究检查了表观遗传标记,详细阐述了在创伤后应激障碍背景下甲基化对组蛋白位置H3K4、H3K9和H3K36处染色质可及性的影响。73项研究调查了DNA甲基化,确定了在创伤后应激障碍参与者中一致观察到的20个高甲基化和5个低甲基化CpG岛。19项研究将88个SNP与创伤后应激障碍联系起来,其中只有一个SNP在这些研究中得到重复。此外,16项研究聚焦于miRNA,结果表明194个下调和24个上调的miRNA与创伤后应激障碍相关。尽管存在受创伤后应激障碍显著影响的表观遗传机制,但对这些机制的细致解构表明,需要采用更细致入微的方法来识别导致创伤后应激障碍的因素。诊断工具的技术进步推动了整合详细参与者特征、创伤类型、遗传易感性以及可靠报告的最佳实践的需求。这种全面的方法对于提高创伤后应激障碍研究在临床应用中的转化潜力至关重要。