• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非精英病例中腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in non-elite cases.

作者信息

Aoki Ryota, Maruyama Satoshi, Takii Yasumasa, Nogami Hitoshi

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, 2-15-3 Kawagishi-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 9518566, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2025 May;55(5):676-684. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02951-6. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02951-6
PMID:39472316
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in non-elite cases.

METHODS

We defined patients whose clinical characteristics conformed to the criteria of the JCOG0404 trial as "elite" and those whose clinical characteristics did not conform to these criteria as "non-elite". Patients with Stage II/III colorectal cancer (n = 450) were analyzed. The elite (E) and non-elite (NE) groups were further divided into open (E-Open, NE-Open) and laparoscopic (E-Lap, NE-Lap) surgery groups. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of these groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed when comparing the NE groups.

RESULTS

The E group included 163 patients and the NE group included 287 patients. Before and after PSM, the NE-Lap group had significantly longer operative times, lower postoperative complication rates, earlier recovery of bowel function, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the NE-Open group. After PSM, the Clavien-Dindo classification Grade ≥ III complications and reoperation rates in the NE-Lap group were significantly lower than those in the NE-Open group. The short-term outcomes of the NE-Lap group were comparable with those of the E-Lap group. The 5-year overall survival rates were not significantly different among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is effective and safe, even in non-elite cases.

摘要

目的

评估非精英病例中腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的疗效。

方法

我们将临床特征符合JCOG0404试验标准的患者定义为“精英”患者,将临床特征不符合这些标准的患者定义为“非精英”患者。对II/III期结直肠癌患者(n = 450)进行分析。精英(E)组和非精英(NE)组进一步分为开放手术(E-Open,NE-Open)组和腹腔镜手术(E-Lap,NE-Lap)组。我们比较了这些组的短期和长期疗效。在比较NE组时进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

E组包括163例患者,NE组包括287例患者。PSM前后,NE-Lap组的手术时间明显长于NE-Open组,术后并发症发生率更低,肠功能恢复更早,术后住院时间更短。PSM后,NE-Lap组的Clavien-Dindo分类≥III级并发症和再次手术率明显低于NE-Open组。NE-Lap组的短期疗效与E-Lap组相当。各组的5年总生存率无显著差异。

结论

即使在非精英病例中,腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术也是有效且安全的。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in non-elite cases.非精英病例中腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的疗效与安全性
Surg Today. 2025 May;55(5):676-684. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02951-6. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Benefits of simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases.同时进行腹腔镜下原发性结直肠癌和肝转移瘤切除术的益处。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Jan;7(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/ases.12066. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
3
Influence of previous abdominal surgery on surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: subanalysis of a large multicenter study in Japan.既往腹部手术对老年结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术与开放手术手术结局的影响:日本一项大型多中心研究的亚组分析
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;52(6):695-704. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1262-5. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除胃胃肠道间质瘤的短期和长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(15):e3135. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003135.
5
Propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer in rural hospitals.农村医院腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结直肠癌的倾向评分匹配研究
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;31(10):1700-1704. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13322.
6
Safety of laparoscopic compared to open right hepatectomy after portal vein occlusion: results from a multicenter study.门静脉阻断后腹腔镜与开腹右半肝切除术的安全性:一项多中心研究结果
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1839-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11532-8. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
7
Laparoscopic hepatic resection for metastatic liver tumor of colorectal cancer: comparative analysis of short- and long-term results.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠癌转移性肝肿瘤:短期和长期结果的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):80-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3165-3. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
8
Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):1028-1035. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2107.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic open surgery for pathological T4 colorectal cancer: 10 years of experience in a single center.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗病理性 T4 结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心 10 年经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 7;24(1):76-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.76.
10
Comparative study of laparoscopic versus open technique for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases with propensity score analysis.腹腔镜与开腹技术行结直肠癌合并肝转移同期切除术的倾向性评分分析对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4772-4780. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07253-4. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction model for postoperative complications in gastrointestinal surgery based on preoperative and intraoperative factors using machine learning: a retrospective, single-center study.基于术前和术中因素的机器学习在胃肠外科术后并发症预测模型:一项回顾性单中心研究
Surg Today. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03110-1.
2
Permissive hypercapnia combined with goal-directed fluid therapy improve postoperative mental health in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.允许性高碳酸血症联合目标导向液体治疗可改善老年腹腔镜手术患者术后心理健康。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 19;15(7):106023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.106023.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open surgery in obstructive colorectal cancer patients following stents placement: a comprehensive meta-analysis of cohort studies.支架置入后梗阻性结直肠癌患者行腹腔镜与开腹手术的比较:队列研究的综合荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1740-1757. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10710-4. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
2
The use of laparoscopy for T4a and T4b colon cancer: are we playing with fire?腹腔镜技术在 T4a 和 T4b 期结肠癌中的应用:我们是否在玩火?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5679-5686. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09944-5. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Impact of preoperative smoking on patients undergoing right hemicolectomies for colon cancer.
术前吸烟对结肠癌行右半结肠切除术患者的影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):2001-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02486-9. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Long-term results of a randomized study comparing open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients (Eld Lap study).老年结直肠癌患者行开放手术与腹腔镜手术的随机对照研究的长期结果(Eld Lap 研究)。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5686-5697. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08026-0. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer patients with high American Society of Anesthesiologists classes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗美国麻醉医师协会分级较高的结直肠癌患者的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jul;13(3):336-342. doi: 10.1111/ases.12766. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
Predictors of complications and mortality following left colectomy with primary stapled anastomosis for cancer: results of a multicentric study with 1111 patients.左半结肠癌行一期吻合术的并发症和死亡率的预测因素:一项包含 1111 例患者的多中心研究结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Nov;20(11):986-995. doi: 10.1111/codi.14309. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术治疗 T4 期结肠癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4902-4912. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 解剖治疗 II 期或 III 期结肠癌的生存结局(JCOG0404):一项 III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30207-2. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Oncologic Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Resection of pT4 Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除pT4期结肠癌后的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):116-125. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000641.
10
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection for Cancer: Multivariate Analysis and Nomogram From a Multicentric, Prospective, National Study With 3193 Patients.结肠癌切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素:一项对3193例患者的多中心、前瞻性、全国性研究的多变量分析和列线图
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):321-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973.