Lyu Wen-Rui, Tang Xiao, Jin Yu, Wang Rui, Li Xu-Yan, Li Ying, Zhang Chun-Yan, Zhao Wei, Tong Zhao-Hui, Sun Bing
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Department of Ultrasonic Diagnosis, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
J Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 29;12(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00756-w.
To verify whether the bleeding risk assessment guidelines from the 9th American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) are prognostic for respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) patients and to explore risk factors for hemorrhages, we conducted a secondary data analysis based on our previously published cohort study of venous thromboembolism.
We performed a secondary data analysis on the single-center prospective cohort from our previous study. Patients admitted to the RICU at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from August 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020 were included and followed up until discharge.
The study enrolled 931 patients, of which 715 (76.8%) were at high risk of bleeding, while the remaining were at low risk. Of the total, 9.2% (86/931) suffered major bleeding, and no significant difference was found between the two risk groups (p = 0.601). High-risk patients had poor outcomes, including higher mortality and longer stays. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were APACHE II score ≥ 15; invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; therapeutic dose of anticoagulants; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; and continuous renal replacement therapy. Blood transfusion not related to bleeding appeared to be an independent protective factor for major bleeding (OR 0.099, 95% CI 0.045-0.218, p < 0.001).
Bleeding risk assessment models from the 9th ACCP guidelines may not be suitable for patients in RICU. Building a bleeding risk assessment model that is suitable for patients in all RICUs remains a challenge. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02213978.
为验证第九版美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)的出血风险评估指南对呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)患者是否具有预后价值,并探究出血的危险因素,我们基于之前发表的静脉血栓栓塞队列研究进行了二次数据分析。
我们对之前研究中的单中心前瞻性队列进行了二次数据分析。纳入2014年8月1日至2020年12月31日在北京朝阳医院RICU住院的患者,并随访至出院。
该研究共纳入931例患者,其中715例(76.8%)为高出血风险患者,其余为低出血风险患者。总体而言,9.2%(86/931)的患者发生了大出血,两组风险组之间未发现显著差异(p = 0.601)。高风险患者预后较差,包括死亡率更高和住院时间更长。大出血的独立危险因素为急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分≥15;侵袭性肺曲霉病;抗凝剂治疗剂量;体外膜肺氧合;以及连续性肾脏替代治疗。与出血无关的输血似乎是大出血的独立保护因素(比值比[OR] 0.099,95%置信区间[CI] 0.045 - 0.218,p < 0.001)。
第九版ACCP指南的出血风险评估模型可能不适用于RICU患者。构建适用于所有RICU患者的出血风险评估模型仍然是一项挑战。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02213978。