文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

评估外科医生和新手在 hi-Sim 和 hinotori 手术机器人系统中的首次触摸技能。

Assessment of first-touch skills in robotic surgical training using hi-Sim and the hinotori surgical robot system among surgeons and novices.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 1;409(1):332. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03514-6.


DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03514-6
PMID:39482467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11527936/
Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgeons' adaptability to robotic manipulation remains underexplored. This study evaluated the participants' first-touch robotic training skills using the hinotori surgical robot system and its simulator (hi-Sim) to assess adaptability. METHODS: We enrolled 11 robotic surgeons (RS), 13 laparoscopic surgeons (LS), and 15 novices (N). After tutorial and training, participants performed pegboard tasks, camera and clutch operations, energizing operations, and suture sponge tasks on hi-Sim. They also completed a suture ligation task using the hinotori surgical robot system on a suture simulator. Median scores and task completion times were compared. RESULTS: Pegboard task scores were 95.0%, 92.0%, and 91.5% for the RS, LS, and N groups, respectively, with differences between the RS group and LS and N groups. Camera and clutch operation scores were 93.1%, 49.7%, and 89.1%, respectively, showing differences between the RS group and LS and N groups. Energizing operation scores were 90.9%, 85.2%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a significant difference between the LS and N groups. Suture sponge task scores were 90.6%, 43.1%, and 46.2%, respectively, with differences between the RS group and LS and N groups. For the suture ligation task, completion times were 368 s, 666 s, and 1095 s, respectively, indicating differences among groups. Suture scores were 12, 10, and 7 points, respectively, with differences between the RS and N groups. CONCLUSION: First-touch simulator-based robotic skills were partially influenced by prior robotic surgical experience, while suturing skills were affected by overall surgical experience. Thus, robotic training programs should be tailored to individual adaptability.

摘要

目的:外科医生对机器人操作的适应能力仍未得到充分探索。本研究使用 hinotori 手术机器人系统及其模拟器(hi-Sim)评估了参与者的首次触摸机器人培训技能,以评估其适应性。

方法:我们招募了 11 名机器人外科医生(RS)、13 名腹腔镜外科医生(LS)和 15 名新手(N)。在教程和培训后,参与者在 hi-Sim 上完成了钉板任务、摄像头和离合器操作、通电操作和缝合海绵任务。他们还使用 hinotori 手术机器人系统在缝合模拟器上完成了缝合结扎任务。比较了中位数得分和任务完成时间。

结果:钉板任务得分分别为 RS 组 95.0%、LS 组 92.0%和 N 组 91.5%,RS 组与 LS 组和 N 组之间存在差异。摄像头和离合器操作得分分别为 RS 组 93.1%、LS 组 49.7%和 N 组 89.1%,RS 组与 LS 组和 N 组之间存在差异。通电操作得分分别为 RS 组 90.9%、LS 组 85.2%和 N 组 95.0%,LS 组与 N 组之间存在差异。缝合海绵任务得分分别为 RS 组 90.6%、LS 组 43.1%和 N 组 46.2%,RS 组与 LS 组和 N 组之间存在差异。对于缝合结扎任务,完成时间分别为 RS 组 368s、LS 组 666s 和 N 组 1095s,表明组间存在差异。缝合得分分别为 RS 组 12 分、LS 组 10 分和 N 组 7 分,RS 组与 N 组之间存在差异。

结论:首次触摸基于模拟器的机器人技能部分受到先前机器人手术经验的影响,而缝合技能受到整体手术经验的影响。因此,机器人培训计划应根据个体适应性进行定制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/11382a3bcdb6/423_2024_3514_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/47614fd68278/423_2024_3514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/54612506b6eb/423_2024_3514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/4e583db1fb60/423_2024_3514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/d12e93d22cfb/423_2024_3514_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/11382a3bcdb6/423_2024_3514_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/47614fd68278/423_2024_3514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/54612506b6eb/423_2024_3514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/4e583db1fb60/423_2024_3514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/d12e93d22cfb/423_2024_3514_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daae/11527936/11382a3bcdb6/423_2024_3514_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Assessment of first-touch skills in robotic surgical training using hi-Sim and the hinotori surgical robot system among surgeons and novices.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024-11-1

[2]
Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017

[3]
Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study.

Surg Endosc. 2018-2-12

[4]
An Efficient Single-session Spatial Skill Trainer for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019-5-27

[5]
Performances on simulator and da Vinci robot on subjects with and without surgical background.

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018-12

[6]
Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?

J Surg Educ. 2017-6-13

[7]
Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks.

J Robot Surg. 2021-2

[8]
Gender differences in the acquisition of suturing skills with the da Vinci surgical system.

J Formos Med Assoc. 2019-7-9

[9]
Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer.

Eur Urol Focus. 2016-11-26

[10]
Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017-7-19

本文引用的文献

[1]
hinotori vs. da Vinci: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

J Robot Surg. 2024-3-18

[2]
Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

J Robot Surg. 2024-1-12

[3]
Robot-assisted adrenalectomy using a hinotori surgical robot system: Report of first series of six cases.

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023-7

[4]
Establishment of a new practical telesurgical platform using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System: a preclinical study.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022-12

[5]
Hinotori Surgical Robot System, a novel robot-assisted surgical platform: Preclinical and clinical evaluation.

Int J Urol. 2022-10

[6]
Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery.

Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020-4-8

[7]
Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study.

Surg Endosc. 2018-2-12

[8]
Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training.

Surg Endosc. 2017-12-6

[9]
Does Previous Laparoscopic Experience Influence Basic Robotic Surgical Skills?

J Surg Educ. 2017-11-28

[10]
Performances on simulator and da Vinci robot on subjects with and without surgical background.

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索