He Tianyu, Hornung Christopher, Evans Michael, Zoghbi Stephanie, Chahine Leya, Nazar Fatima A, Nelson Dwight, Nakib Nissrine
Department of Urology, University of Minnesota.
Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota.
Res Sq. 2024 Oct 18:rs.3.rs-4980674. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4980674/v1.
Accurate positioning and effective programming of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) relies upon the use of several acute stimulation measurements. While the clinical utility of these acute measurements including pelvic floor motor thresholds (PFMT), toe/leg motor thresholds (TMT), and sensory thresholds (ST), are widely accepted, their usefulness in quantitative research remains unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to test these measurements and gauge their utility in future research.
Eight participants received Axonics SNM, 6 Medtronic Interstim II, and 2 Medtronic Micro SNM. PFMT was measured after implantation. ST and the location of sensation (LOS) were measured immediately postoperatively (PO), at pre-release from the surgery center (PR), and during a follow-up clinic visit (FU). Thresholds were compared across contact and time using linear mixed-effects models.
Significant differences in PFMT were found across electrode configurations, with stimulation through proximal contacts exhibiting lower PFMT than distal configurations. ST displayed no significant differences across electrodes and showed minimal changes over time. LOS exhibited substantial variability across patients and periods.
Results suggest that PFMT were able to differentiate differences across electrode configurations that may be useful for future quantitative research. The lack of differences in ST and LOS across electrode configurations was interesting given the focus on these measurements clinically. Future testing is to confirm these limitations.
骶神经调节(SNM)的精确定位和有效编程依赖于多种急性刺激测量方法的使用。虽然这些急性测量方法的临床效用,包括盆底运动阈值(PFMT)、脚趾/腿部运动阈值(TMT)和感觉阈值(ST),已被广泛接受,但其在定量研究中的实用性仍不明确。这项前瞻性研究的目的是测试这些测量方法,并评估它们在未来研究中的效用。
八名参与者接受了Axonics SNM,六名接受了美敦力Interstim II,两名接受了美敦力Micro SNM。植入后测量PFMT。术后立即(PO)、手术中心出院前(PR)以及随访门诊时(FU)测量ST和感觉位置(LOS)。使用线性混合效应模型比较不同触点和时间的阈值。
不同电极配置的PFMT存在显著差异,通过近端触点刺激时的PFMT低于远端配置。ST在不同电极之间无显著差异,且随时间变化极小。LOS在患者和时间段之间表现出很大的变异性。
结果表明,PFMT能够区分不同电极配置之间的差异,这可能对未来的定量研究有用。考虑到临床上对这些测量方法的关注,不同电极配置的ST和LOS缺乏差异很有意思。未来的测试将证实这些局限性。