Significance of anatomical resection and wide surgical margin for HCC patients with MVI undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of surgical resection margin and hepatic resection type on prognosis and compare their prognostic significance on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with or without microvascular invasion (MVI) who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 patients with HCC who underwent LLR. According to the grading of MVI, patients were classified as M0, M1 and M2. Patients were divided into the anatomical resection (AR) and nonanatomical resection (NAR) groups according to the hepatic resection type. Survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the effects of AR and NAR, wide and narrow resection margin on overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, narrow resection margin was an independent risk factor for OS and TTR, whereas NAR was not. Subgroup analysis showed that narrow resection margin and NAR were both independent risk factors for OS and TTR in HCC patients with MVI. The 5-year OS and TTR rates of the two groups (NAR-wide resection margin and AR-narrow resection margin) with M1 were 85.3 % versus 62 % and 34.4 % versus 60.2 %. Similarly, the 5-year OS and TTR rates of the two groups (NAR-wide resection margin and AR-narrow resection margin) with M2 were 80.2 % versus 47.9 % and 30.8 % versus 64.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical hepatectomy and wide resection margin were independent protective factors for HCC patients with MVI receiving LLR. Nonetheless, wide resection margin had a greater impact on prognosis than anatomical hepatectomy.