Suppr超能文献

编辑推荐——颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术后的卒中与死亡:法国一项为期十年的全国性研究

Editor's Choice - Stroke and Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting: A Ten Year Nationwide Study in France.

作者信息

Steinmetz Eric, Cottenet Jonathan, Mariet Anne-Sophie, Morin Lucas, Bernard Alain, Béjot Yannick, Quantin Catherine

机构信息

Service de chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire et Thoracique, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France; Physiopathologie et Epidémiologie Cérébro-Cardiovasculaires (PEC2), EA7460, Faculty of Health Sciences, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Service de Biostatistiques et d'Information Médicale (DIM); CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Mar;69(3):359-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.031. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective, nationwide cohort study aimed to compare peri-procedural stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure (PPSD30) in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid stenting (CAS).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the French hospital database PMSI. All patients who underwent CEA or CAS between 2010 and 2019 in France were included. Information on individual patients and hospital characteristics was retrieved. A random effects logistic regression model compared the occurrence of PPSD30 after CEA or CAS. High surgical risk was accounted for by using propensity score matching and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Analyses were also stratified to consider symptomatic and asymptomatic patients separately.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2019, 164 248 patients underwent a carotid artery procedure in France: 156 561 CEA and 7 687 CAS (including about 25% asymptomatic women and 40% high risk patients). The PPSD30 rate was 1.5% overall (n = 2 514 patients) (1.5% after CEA vs. 2.4% after CAS), 1.3% in asymptomatic patients (1.2% after CEA vs. 1.8% after CAS), and 3.3% in symptomatic patients (3.1% after CEA vs. 6.5% after CAS). After matching and adjustment, the risk of PPSD30 was statistically significantly greater in patients who underwent CAS than in patients who underwent CEA (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 1.8 overall; aOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 1.8 in asymptomatic patients; and aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8 - 4.0 in symptomatic patients).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide real life study showed that CEA performed better than CAS, more markedly in symptomatic patients, but also in asymptomatic patients. Moreover, many patients received procedures that were more likely to be harmful than beneficial according to conclusions from past randomised trials (i.e., all asymptomatic women, all high surgical risk patients, and all who had undergone CAS).

摘要

目的

这项全国性的回顾性队列研究旨在比较接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的患者在术后30天内发生围手术期卒中或死亡(PPSD30)的情况。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自法国医院数据库PMSI的数据。纳入了2010年至2019年期间在法国接受CEA或CAS的所有患者。收集了个体患者和医院特征的信息。采用随机效应逻辑回归模型比较CEA或CAS后PPSD30的发生率。通过倾向得分匹配考虑高手术风险,并对患者和医院特征进行调整。分析还进行了分层,以分别考虑有症状和无症状的患者。

结果

2010年至2019年期间,法国有164248例患者接受了颈动脉手术:156561例CEA和7687例CAS(包括约25%的无症状女性和40%的高风险患者)。总体PPSD30发生率为1.5%(n = 2514例患者)(CEA后为1.5%,CAS后为2.4%),无症状患者为1.3%(CEA后为1.2%,CAS后为1.8%),有症状患者为3.3%(CEA后为3.1%,CAS后为6.5%)。在匹配和调整后,接受CAS的患者发生PPSD30的风险在统计学上显著高于接受CEA的患者(总体调整后比值比[aOR]为1.4,95%置信区间[CI]为1.1 - 1.8;无症状患者aOR为1.4,95% CI为1.1 - 1.8;有症状患者aOR为2.7,95% CI为1.8 - 4.0)。

结论

这项全国性的现实生活研究表明,CEA的效果优于CAS,在有症状患者中更为明显,在无症状患者中也是如此。此外,根据过去随机试验的结论,许多患者接受的手术可能弊大于利(即所有无症状女性、所有高手术风险患者以及所有接受CAS的患者)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验