Cao Rong, Wang Jian, Xue Song
School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Biol Psychol. 2024 Nov;193:108898. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108898. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
With the rapid development of digital communication, emojis have played an increasingly important role in computer-mediated communication (CMC). Although Non-face emojis account for approximately 90 % of emoji usage, related research remains relatively scarce. Furthermore, there is limited exploration of the differences in the mechanisms of text processing between Face and Non-face emojis. The aim of this study is to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the differences in text processing between Face emojis and Non-face emojis. We employed a semantic violation paradigm to analyze the cognitive processes of 28 participants as they processed texts in which emojis replaced words. The experimental materials consisted of 8 target stimuli, each corresponding to 15 text sentences. The results indicate that Non-face emojis elicited a strong N400 effect in incongruent texts, suggesting that Non-face emojis may have higher semantic complexity and can function as substitutes for words. In contrast, Face emojis primarily elicited an LNC component, indicating that they are more likely to be perceived as symbols of emotional expression rather than carriers of explicit semantic information. These results reveal the distinct roles of Face and Non-face emojis in text comprehension, providing new insights into emoji semantics and their impact on language processing.
随着数字通信的迅速发展,表情符号在计算机介导的交流(CMC)中发挥着越来越重要的作用。尽管非面部表情符号约占表情符号使用量的90%,但相关研究仍然相对较少。此外,对于面部表情符号和非面部表情符号在文本处理机制上的差异探索有限。本研究的目的是调查面部表情符号和非面部表情符号在文本处理方面存在差异的神经机制。我们采用语义违反范式来分析28名参与者在处理表情符号替换单词的文本时的认知过程。实验材料包括8个目标刺激,每个目标刺激对应15个文本句子。结果表明,在不一致的文本中,非面部表情符号引发了强烈的N400效应,这表明非面部表情符号可能具有更高的语义复杂性,并且可以作为单词的替代品。相比之下,面部表情符号主要引发了LNC成分,这表明它们更有可能被视为情感表达的符号,而不是明确语义信息的载体。这些结果揭示了面部表情符号和非面部表情符号在文本理解中的不同作用,为表情符号语义及其对语言处理的影响提供了新的见解。