• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腕戴式活动追踪器测量腹部大手术后患者步数的准确性:一项验证研究。

Accuracy of wrist-worn activity trackers for measuring steps in patients after major abdominal surgery: A validation study.

作者信息

Li Zhi, Feng Weiyan, Zhou Lili, Gong Shu

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Nov 4;10:20552076241297036. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297036. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241297036
PMID:39502479
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11536558/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wearable activity trackers provide a simple and objective measurement of postoperative mobilization. However, few have validated the accuracy of trackers in patients after major abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of wrist-worn activity trackers to measure steps of patients in early mobilization after major abdominal surgery, and to explore the influence of clinical variables and gait parameters on the accuracy of trackers.

METHODS

Forty-five patients after major abdominal surgery were recruited to participate in modified six-minute walk tests wearing three trackers simultaneously, the Fitbit Inspire HR, Xiaomi MI 4, and HONOR 5. The differences in displayed steps before and after the walking test were considered as the step counts measured by the trackers; the actual steps taken were determined as the average of the values manually counted by two researchers. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman method, mean percentage error, and mean absolute percentage error were used to assess the accuracy of trackers with reference to manual step counts.

RESULTS

The three trackers undercounted postoperative steps by -65.5% to -23.5%. Analysis showed low-to-good agreement between step counts recorded by trackers and actual steps (ICC = 0.35-0.75); the mean absolute percentage errors ranged from 24.5% to 65.7%. For all trackers, mean absolute percentage errors correlated negatively with postoperative days ( = -0.626 to -0.744), walking speed ( = -0.714 to -0.854), step length ( = -0.466 to -0.615), and cadence ( = -0.681 to -0.790), while there were positive correlations between mean absolute percentage errors and the number of abdominal drains ( = 0.450-0.514).

CONCLUSIONS

The specific activity trackers used in this study might not be reliable tools for measuring steps counts during the walking test in the early postoperative period for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景

可穿戴活动追踪器为术后活动提供了一种简单且客观的测量方法。然而,很少有研究验证追踪器在腹部大手术后患者中的准确性。

目的

探讨腕戴式活动追踪器测量腹部大手术后早期活动患者步数的准确性,并探究临床变量和步态参数对追踪器准确性的影响。

方法

招募45例腹部大手术后的患者,同时佩戴三款追踪器(Fitbit Inspire HR、小米MI 4和荣耀5)参与改良六分钟步行测试。步行测试前后追踪器显示的步数差异被视为追踪器测量的步数;实际步数通过两名研究人员手动计数的平均值确定。采用组内相关系数、Bland-Altman方法、平均百分比误差和平均绝对百分比误差,参照手动计数步数评估追踪器的准确性。

结果

三款追踪器对术后步数的计数少了65.5%至23.5%。分析表明,追踪器记录的步数与实际步数之间的一致性为低到良好(ICC = 0.35 - 0.75);平均绝对百分比误差在24.5%至65.7%之间。对于所有追踪器,平均绝对百分比误差与术后天数(r = -0.626至-0.744)、步行速度(r = -0.714至-0.854)、步长(r = -0.466至-0.615)和步频(r = -0.681至-0.790)呈负相关,而与腹腔引流管数量呈正相关(r = 0.450 - 0.514)。

结论

本研究中使用的特定活动追踪器可能不是测量腹部大手术患者术后早期步行测试中步数的可靠工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/f4d8fb224552/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/7aa070dc8f82/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/03e369f9e465/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/f4d8fb224552/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/7aa070dc8f82/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/03e369f9e465/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46c9/11536558/f4d8fb224552/10.1177_20552076241297036-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of wrist-worn activity trackers for measuring steps in patients after major abdominal surgery: A validation study.腕戴式活动追踪器测量腹部大手术后患者步数的准确性:一项验证研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 4;10:20552076241297036. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297036. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.基于低成本消费者的追踪器在自由生活条件下测量成年人的身体活动和睡眠持续时间:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 19;8(5):e16674. doi: 10.2196/16674.
3
The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart HR and StepWatch 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.活动追踪器的有效性受步行速度影响:佳明Vivosmart HR和StepWatch 3在受控条件下于不同步行速度时测量步数的标准效度。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 14;8:e9381. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9381. eCollection 2020.
4
How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities.你的活动追踪器有多准确?低强度体育活动中步数计数的比较研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 11;5(8):e106. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6321.
5
Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.在老年人群体的自然生活环境中评估 Fitbit Charge2 和 Garmin vivosmart HR+ 的有效性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):e13084. doi: 10.2196/13084.
6
Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them?可穿戴活动追踪器在帕金森病中的准确性:我们应该开这些处方吗?
Phys Ther. 2018 Aug 1;98(8):705-714. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy054.
7
Accuracy and Precision of Three Consumer-Grade Motion Sensors During Overground and Treadmill Walking in People With Parkinson Disease: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.帕金森病患者在地面行走和跑步机行走时三种消费级运动传感器的准确性和精确性:横断面比较研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Jan 16;7(1):e14059. doi: 10.2196/14059.
8
Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study.腕戴活动追踪器和移动应用程序在评估高中生身体活动方面是否有效?Wearfit 研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Sep 1;21(3):356-375. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.356. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls.基于消费者的活动追踪器作为 COPD 患者和健康对照的测量工具和教练设备的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 4;15(8):e0236676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236676. eCollection 2020.
10
Measuring ambulation with wrist-based and hip-based activity trackers for children with cerebral palsy.使用腕部和髋部活动追踪器测量脑瘫儿童的活动能力。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Nov;61(11):1309-1313. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14207. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy and Precision of Energy Expenditure, Heart Rate, and Steps Measured by Combined-Sensing Fitbits Against Reference Measures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.联合感应 Fitbit 测量的能量消耗、心率和步数的准确性和精密度与参考测量值的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e35626. doi: 10.2196/35626.
2
Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature.腕戴式活动追踪设备的准确性和可接受性:文献系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e30791. doi: 10.2196/30791.
3
Smartband Use During Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Facilitates Inpatient Recuperation Following Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.
术后加速康复期间使用智能手环有助于微创结直肠手术后的住院康复。
Front Surg. 2021 Jan 20;7:608950. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.608950. eCollection 2020.
4
Validity of Consumer Activity Monitors and an Algorithm Using Smartphone Data for Measuring Steps during Different Activity Types.消费者活动监测器的有效性及一种使用智能手机数据测量不同活动类型下步数的算法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 12;17(24):9314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249314.
5
Improving postoperative mobilisation rates in patients undergoing elective major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.提高择期大肝胰胆手术患者的术后活动率。
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Apr;97(1146):239-247. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138650. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Can Early Postoperative Complications Predict High Morbidity and Decrease Failure to Rescue Following Major Abdominal Surgery?术后早期并发症能否预测重大腹部手术后的高发病率和降低抢救失败率?
Ann Surg. 2020 Nov;272(5):834-839. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004254.
7
Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.市面上可用于测量步数、能量消耗和心率的可穿戴设备的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 8;8(9):e18694. doi: 10.2196/18694.
8
Effectiveness of Wearable Trackers on Physical Activity in Healthy Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.可穿戴追踪器对健康成年人身体活动的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 22;8(7):e15576. doi: 10.2196/15576.
9
Postoperative complications and mobilisation following major abdominal surgery with vs. without fitness tracker-based feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): study protocol for a student-led multicentre randomised controlled trial (CHIR-Net SIGMA study group).主要腹部手术后使用与不使用健身追踪器反馈的术后并发症和活动能力:一项由学生主导的多中心随机对照试验(CHIR-Net SIGMA 研究小组)的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 23;21(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4220-8.
10
The Assessment of Complications After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comparison of Two Scales.主要腹部手术后并发症的评估:两种量表的比较。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 29.