Suppr超能文献

数字心理健康技术的监管与评估考量

Considerations for regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies.

作者信息

Hopkin Gareth, Branson Richard, Campbell Paul, Coole Holly, Cooper Sophie, Edelmann Francesca, Salmon Mark

机构信息

Science Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, England, UK.

Software Team, Healthcare Quality and Access Group, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, England, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Nov 4;10:20552076241293313. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293313. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) are becoming well established within mental health services and through direct-to-consumer models. Due to their scalable nature, DMHTs may support services to bridge the gap between demand and the available workforce, particularly where existing pathways have long delays or restricted capacity. Challenges and risks associated with DMHTs also need consideration. Regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies play a key role in ensuring the potential of DMHTs is achieved and their risks are mitigated. However, the nature of DMHTs and advances in digital technology present challenges for regulation and evaluation. In this paper, we describe eight key considerations across the regulatory and HTA pathway for DMHTs. These relate to 1) intended purpose, 2) qualification and classification, 3) risk management, 4) clinical evidence, 5) resource requirements and economic evidence, 6) post-market surveillance and life cycle assessment, 7) replicability and equity, and 8) wider responsibilities. Ensuring clarity within these considerations and addressing outstanding uncertainties is necessary to ensure that the benefits of DMHTs are unlocked, while also ensuring that people have access to high quality and safe tools.

摘要

数字心理健康技术(DMHTs)正在心理健康服务领域以及通过直接面向消费者的模式逐渐确立起来。由于其可扩展的特性,DMHTs 可以支持心理健康服务弥合需求与现有劳动力之间的差距,特别是在现有途径存在长时间延误或能力受限的情况下。与 DMHTs 相关的挑战和风险也需要加以考虑。监管机构和卫生技术评估(HTA)机构在确保实现 DMHTs 的潜力并降低其风险方面发挥着关键作用。然而,DMHTs 的性质和数字技术的进步给监管和评估带来了挑战。在本文中,我们描述了 DMHTs 在监管和 HTA 流程中的八个关键考量因素。这些因素涉及:1)预期用途;2)资格认定和分类;3)风险管理;4)临床证据;5)资源需求和经济证据;6)上市后监测和生命周期评估;7)可复制性和平等性;8)更广泛的责任。确保这些考量因素清晰明确并解决悬而未决的不确定性对于释放 DMHTs 的益处至关重要,同时也要确保人们能够使用高质量且安全的工具。

相似文献

1
Considerations for regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies.数字心理健康技术的监管与评估考量
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 4;10:20552076241293313. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293313. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Interdisciplinary perspectives on digital technologies for global mental health.关于全球精神卫生数字技术的跨学科视角。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;4(2):e0002867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002867. eCollection 2024.
4
Digital Tools-Regulatory Considerations for Application in Clinical Trials.数字工具——临床试验应用的监管考虑因素。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):769-782. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00535-z. Epub 2023 May 17.
9

本文引用的文献

5
Digital mental health: challenges and next steps.数字心理健康:挑战与下一步
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Feb;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300670.
6
Mental health in the digital age.数字时代的心理健康。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e765. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00191-1. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Digital therapeutics for mental health: Is attrition the Achilles heel?心理健康的数字疗法:损耗是其致命弱点吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 5;13:900615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900615. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验