• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Considerations for regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies.数字心理健康技术的监管与评估考量
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 4;10:20552076241293313. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293313. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Interdisciplinary perspectives on digital technologies for global mental health.关于全球精神卫生数字技术的跨学科视角。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;4(2):e0002867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002867. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of Digital Mental Health Technologies in the United States: Systematic Literature Review and Framework Synthesis.美国数字心理健康技术评估:系统文献回顾与框架综合。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 30;11:e57401. doi: 10.2196/57401.
4
Digital Tools-Regulatory Considerations for Application in Clinical Trials.数字工具——临床试验应用的监管考虑因素。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):769-782. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00535-z. Epub 2023 May 17.
5
Assessment of barriers to effective use of psychiatric advance directives: Providers' knowledge and attitudes.评估精神科预先指示有效使用的障碍:提供者的知识和态度。
Psychol Serv. 2022 May;19(2):271-282. doi: 10.1037/ser0000525. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
6
Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment.班伯里论坛关于数字心理健康治疗前进道路的共识声明。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jun;72(6):677-683. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000561. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study.心理健康与新冠疫情期间一线工作者及失业人员对数字心理健康工具的感知易用性:横断面调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):e28360. doi: 10.2196/28360.
8
Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply.探索伊朗卫生技术评估的全貌:利益相关者对需求、需求和供应的看法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 15;22(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01097-0.
9
10
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.

引用本文的文献

1
Passive Sensing for Mental Health Monitoring Using Machine Learning With Wearables and Smartphones: Scoping Review.使用可穿戴设备和智能手机通过机器学习进行心理健康监测的被动传感:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e77066. doi: 10.2196/77066.
2
Toward a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Mental Health Technologies: Scoping Review.迈向数字心理健康技术的新概念框架:范围综述。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 19;12:e63484. doi: 10.2196/63484.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the gap from medical to psychological safety assessment: consensus study in a digital mental health context.弥合从医学到心理安全评估的差距:数字心理健康背景下的共识研究。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Jun 3;10(4):e126. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.713.
2
Integration of digital health applications into the German healthcare system: development of "The DiGA-Care Path".将数字健康应用整合到德国医疗体系:“数字健康应用护理路径”的开发
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 13;4:1372522. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1372522. eCollection 2024.
3
An Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Care: Considerations and Guidance.心理健康护理中的生成式人工智能简介:考量与指导
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Dec;25(12):839-846. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01477-x. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Digital health for all: How digital health could reduce inequality and increase universal health coverage.全民数字健康:数字健康如何减少不平等并提高全民健康覆盖水平。
Digit Health. 2023 Jul 7;9:20552076231185434. doi: 10.1177/20552076231185434. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Digital mental health: challenges and next steps.数字心理健康:挑战与下一步
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Feb;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300670.
6
Mental health in the digital age.数字时代的心理健康。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e765. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00191-1. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
Regulatory considerations to keep pace with innovation in digital health products.跟上数字健康产品创新步伐的监管考量。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 19;5(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00668-9.
8
Digital therapeutics for mental health: Is attrition the Achilles heel?心理健康的数字疗法:损耗是其致命弱点吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 5;13:900615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900615. eCollection 2022.
9
Effect of Offering Care Management or Online Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Training vs Usual Care on Self-harm Among Adult Outpatients With Suicidal Ideation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.提供护理管理或在线辩证行为治疗技能培训与常规护理相比对有自杀意念的成年门诊患者自伤的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):630-638. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0423.
10
The Impact of Digital Therapeutics on Current Health Technology Assessment Frameworks.数字疗法对当前健康技术评估框架的影响。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 9;3:667016. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.667016. eCollection 2021.

数字心理健康技术的监管与评估考量

Considerations for regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies.

作者信息

Hopkin Gareth, Branson Richard, Campbell Paul, Coole Holly, Cooper Sophie, Edelmann Francesca, Salmon Mark

机构信息

Science Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, England, UK.

Software Team, Healthcare Quality and Access Group, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, England, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Nov 4;10:20552076241293313. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293313. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241293313
PMID:39502489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11536580/
Abstract

Digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) are becoming well established within mental health services and through direct-to-consumer models. Due to their scalable nature, DMHTs may support services to bridge the gap between demand and the available workforce, particularly where existing pathways have long delays or restricted capacity. Challenges and risks associated with DMHTs also need consideration. Regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies play a key role in ensuring the potential of DMHTs is achieved and their risks are mitigated. However, the nature of DMHTs and advances in digital technology present challenges for regulation and evaluation. In this paper, we describe eight key considerations across the regulatory and HTA pathway for DMHTs. These relate to 1) intended purpose, 2) qualification and classification, 3) risk management, 4) clinical evidence, 5) resource requirements and economic evidence, 6) post-market surveillance and life cycle assessment, 7) replicability and equity, and 8) wider responsibilities. Ensuring clarity within these considerations and addressing outstanding uncertainties is necessary to ensure that the benefits of DMHTs are unlocked, while also ensuring that people have access to high quality and safe tools.

摘要

数字心理健康技术(DMHTs)正在心理健康服务领域以及通过直接面向消费者的模式逐渐确立起来。由于其可扩展的特性,DMHTs 可以支持心理健康服务弥合需求与现有劳动力之间的差距,特别是在现有途径存在长时间延误或能力受限的情况下。与 DMHTs 相关的挑战和风险也需要加以考虑。监管机构和卫生技术评估(HTA)机构在确保实现 DMHTs 的潜力并降低其风险方面发挥着关键作用。然而,DMHTs 的性质和数字技术的进步给监管和评估带来了挑战。在本文中,我们描述了 DMHTs 在监管和 HTA 流程中的八个关键考量因素。这些因素涉及:1)预期用途;2)资格认定和分类;3)风险管理;4)临床证据;5)资源需求和经济证据;6)上市后监测和生命周期评估;7)可复制性和平等性;8)更广泛的责任。确保这些考量因素清晰明确并解决悬而未决的不确定性对于释放 DMHTs 的益处至关重要,同时也要确保人们能够使用高质量且安全的工具。