• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过目光引导:大型组织高层成员增强的社会注意力。

Leading through gaze: Enhanced social attention in high-rank members of a large-scale organization.

作者信息

Ponsi Giorgia, Schepisi Michael, Ferri Donato, Bianchi Francesco, Consiglio Chiara, Borgogni Laura, Aglioti Salvatore Maria

机构信息

Sapienza University of Rome and Center for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Italian Institute of Technology, Rome, Italy.

IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

iScience. 2024 Oct 10;27(11):111129. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111129. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111129
PMID:39507259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539595/
Abstract

Human attention is naturally directed where others are looking. Primate research indicates that this phenomenon is influenced by the social rank of the gazer. Whether this applies to human societies remains underexplored. Diverging from the typical approach based on transient social rank manipulations in convenience samples, we tested low- and high-rank individuals permanently working in a large-scale organization. Participants executed saccades toward positions matching or not the gaze direction of distractor faces varying in dominance level (low, neutral, and high). The analysis of saccadic reaction time revealed that high-rank participants were more interfered by face distractors, regardless of dominance. Our results suggest that an important feature of leadership is related to the fine-tuning of social attention. These findings not only contribute to understanding how hierarchical rank shapes social cognition but also have implications for organizational behavior and leadership training strategies.

摘要

人类的注意力自然会被吸引到他人正在注视的地方。灵长类动物研究表明,这种现象会受到注视者社会地位的影响。这一现象是否适用于人类社会仍有待深入探索。与基于便利样本中短暂社会地位操纵的典型方法不同,我们测试了在大型组织中长期工作的低级别和高级别个体。参与者向与不同优势水平(低、中性和高)的干扰面孔的注视方向匹配或不匹配的位置执行扫视。对扫视反应时间的分析表明,无论优势水平如何,高级别参与者更容易受到面孔干扰的影响。我们的研究结果表明,领导力的一个重要特征与社会注意力的微调有关。这些发现不仅有助于理解等级制度如何塑造社会认知,还对组织行为和领导力培训策略具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/f9a7b4e2573d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/27a8edf237e4/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/2971cbd40063/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/90adaa106469/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/91295517649b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/f9a7b4e2573d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/27a8edf237e4/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/2971cbd40063/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/90adaa106469/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/91295517649b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b23/11539595/f9a7b4e2573d/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Leading through gaze: Enhanced social attention in high-rank members of a large-scale organization.通过目光引导:大型组织高层成员增强的社会注意力。
iScience. 2024 Oct 10;27(11):111129. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111129. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
2
The Impact of Same- and Other-Race Gaze Distractors on the Control of Saccadic Eye Movements.同种族和其他种族注视干扰物对眼跳运动控制的影响。
Perception. 2015;44(8-9):1020-8. doi: 10.1177/0301006615594936. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
3
Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.注视和箭头干扰物对扫视轨迹的影响相似。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2120-40. doi: 10.1080/17470211003718721. Epub 2010 May 17.
4
Early saccade planning cannot override oculomotor interference elicited by gaze and arrow distractors.早期眼跳计划不能克服由注视和箭头分心物引起的眼动干扰。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):990-997. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01768-x.
5
Gaze distractors influence saccadic curvature: evidence for the role of the oculomotor system in gaze-cued orienting.注视干扰物会影响扫视曲率:动眼系统在注视提示定向中作用的证据。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(21):3674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
6
Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others.在感知他人的主导地位时整合注视方向和面部形状的性别差异。
Perception. 2009;38(9):1275-83. doi: 10.1068/p6347.
7
Oxytocin and social gaze during a dominance categorization task in tufted capuchin monkeys.簇绒卷尾猴在优势等级分类任务中的催产素与社会注视
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:977771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977771. eCollection 2022.
8
Cross-cultural asymmetries in oculomotor interference elicited by gaze distractors belonging to Asian and White faces.跨文化的眼球运动干扰不对称性,由属于亚洲人和白种人面孔的注视干扰者引起。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99954-x.
9
Perception and Processing of Faces in the Human Brain Is Tuned to Typical Feature Locations.人类大脑中对面部的感知和处理会根据典型特征位置进行调整。
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 7;36(36):9289-302. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4131-14.2016.
10
Attention holding elicited by direct-gaze faces is reflected in saccadic peak velocity.由直视面孔引发的注意力保持在扫视峰值速度中得以体现。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3319-3332. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5059-4. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurophysiological markers of asymmetric emotional contagion: implications for organizational contexts.不对称情绪感染的神经生理标志物:对组织环境的影响
Front Integr Neurosci. 2024 Jan 30;18:1321130. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1321130. eCollection 2024.
2
Differences in the Social Motivations and Emotions of Humans and Other Great Apes.人类与其他大型猿类的社会动机和情绪的差异。
Hum Nat. 2023 Dec;34(4):588-604. doi: 10.1007/s12110-023-09464-0. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
Human group size puzzle: why it is odd that we live in large societies.
人类群体规模之谜:为何我们生活在大型社会中是件奇怪的事。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Aug 16;10(8):230559. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230559. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Minimal reporting guideline for research involving eye tracking (2023 edition).眼动追踪研究的最低报告规范(2023 年版)。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4351-4357. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02187-1. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Bringing social interaction at the core of organizational neuroscience.将社会互动置于组织神经科学的核心。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 17;13:1034454. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1034454. eCollection 2022.
6
A systematic exclusion induced by institutional ranking in engineering faculty hiring: Introducing a cycle of winners and losers.制度性排名导致工程学院教师招聘中的系统性排斥:引入赢家和输家的循环。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0275861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275861. eCollection 2022.
7
Organizational Social Relations and Social Embedding: A Pluralistic Review.组织社会关系与社会嵌入:多元性综述
J Manage. 2023 Jan;49(1):474-508. doi: 10.1177/01492063221117120. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
8
Tuning social modulations of gaze cueing via contextual factors.通过上下文因素调整注视线索的社会调节。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):1004-1010. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02211-z. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
Cross-cultural asymmetries in oculomotor interference elicited by gaze distractors belonging to Asian and White faces.跨文化的眼球运动干扰不对称性,由属于亚洲人和白种人面孔的注视干扰者引起。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99954-x.
10
The interplay between gaze cueing and facial trait impressions.注视提示与面部特征印象的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Sep;74(9):1642-1655. doi: 10.1177/17470218211007791. Epub 2021 Apr 5.