Devreese Katrien M J, Bertolaccini Maria Laura, Branch D Ware, de Laat Bas, Erkan Doruk, Favaloro Emmanuel J, Pengo Vittorio, Ortel Thomas L, Wahl Denis, Cohen Hannah
Coagulation Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Feb;23(2):731-744. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.022. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) diagnosis is dependent on the accurate detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) remain the cornerstone of the laboratory part of APS diagnosis. In the 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) APS classification criteria, the type of laboratory parameters remain essentially unchanged compared with the updated Sapporo classification criteria, and aCL and aβ2GPI measurement are still restricted to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with moderate and high titer aPL thresholds defined as 40 and 80 Units, respectively, and a cutoff calculated by the 99th percentile has been abandoned. We must differentiate between classification criteria and assessment of aPL in clinical care. Classification criteria are strict and meant for participant inclusion in studies and trials to study homogeneous populations of patients. In contrast, laboratory detection for APS diagnosis in daily practice is broader, meant to diagnose each APS patient to optimize their management. Nowadays, there is increasing use of measurement of aPL by methods other than ELISAs , the semiquantitative reporting of titers is a matter of debate, as well as the role of the isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgA, and the role of other aPL, such as antiphosphatidylserine (aPS)/prothrombin (PT) antibodies. Patients diagnosed with the disease may or may not fulfill the classification criteria, and inappropriate use of classification criteria may lead to mis(under)diagnosis. The aim of this guidance, based on literature and expert opinion, is to provide guidance recommendations for laboratory workers and clinicians on routine diagnostic assessment of patients with suspected APS.
抗磷脂综合征(APS)的诊断依赖于抗磷脂抗体(aPL)的准确检测和解读。狼疮抗凝物(LA)、抗心磷脂抗体(aCL)和抗β2糖蛋白I抗体(aβ2GPI)仍然是APS诊断实验室部分的基石。在2023年美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲风湿病联盟(EULAR)的APS分类标准中,实验室参数类型与更新后的札幌分类标准相比基本保持不变,aCL和aβ2GPI的检测仍仅限于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),中度和高度滴度aPL阈值分别定义为40和80单位,并且已放弃通过第99百分位数计算的临界值。我们必须区分临床护理中aPL的分类标准和评估。分类标准很严格,旨在将参与者纳入研究和试验,以研究同质患者群体。相比之下,日常实践中用于APS诊断的实验室检测范围更广,旨在诊断每一位APS患者以优化其管理。如今,除ELISA方法外,aPL检测方法的使用越来越多,滴度的半定量报告存在争议,免疫球蛋白(Ig)M和IgA同种型的作用以及其他aPL的作用,如抗磷脂酰丝氨酸(aPS)/凝血酶原(PT)抗体的作用也存在争议。被诊断患有该疾病的患者可能符合也可能不符合分类标准,不恰当地使用分类标准可能导致误诊(漏诊)。本指南基于文献和专家意见,旨在为实验室工作人员和临床医生提供关于疑似APS患者常规诊断评估的指导建议。