EMBRACE Lab, Center for Health and Medical Psychology (CHAMP), University of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden.
Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):e70009. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70009.
Individuals with chronic illnesses and those infected with SARS-CoV-2 often face stigma, shame, and psychological distress related to their conditions. Higher psychological flexibility and self-compassion are often associated with less stigma and shame. Examining and comparing these experiences between people with chronic illness and people who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 can provide valuable insights into the shared and unique challenges they encounter. This study aimed to compare these two groups, and used structural equation modelling to investigate the links between stigma, shame, and psychological distress, with a focus on the mediating roles of psychological flexibility and self-compassion in these associations. The study included 270 Portuguese participants (chronic illness: n = 104; SARS-CoV-2: n = 166), with an average age of 36.73 years and 86.6% of the sample being women. Results showed that the chronic illness subgroup reported higher levels of illness stigma, anxiety, and depression, compared to the SARS-CoV-2 subgroup. Findings from the mediation analysis, revealed that the model fit exceptionally well, accounting for 48% of the variance in anxiety and 45% in depression symptoms across the entire sample. Most parameters were consistent between the two subgroups, except for the association between self-compassion and depression symptoms, which was only statistically significant in the chronic illness subgroup. In this group, both psychological flexibility and self-compassion mediated the association between stigma and shame with symptoms of anxiety and depression. In the SARS-CoV-2 subgroup, these processes mediated the association with anxiety, whereas psychological flexibility only mediated depression symptoms. The findings from this study provide directions for future research on the possible development or refinement of personalized psychological interventions targeting emotional distress in adults with chronic illnesses and viral disease recovery cohorts.
患有慢性病和感染 SARS-CoV-2 的个体经常面临与自身状况相关的耻辱感、羞耻感和心理困扰。较高的心理灵活性和自我同情通常与较少的耻辱感和羞耻感相关。研究慢性疾病患者和 SARS-CoV-2 康复患者之间的这些经历,可以为他们共同面临的挑战提供有价值的见解。本研究旨在比较这两组人群,并使用结构方程模型探讨耻辱感、羞耻感和心理困扰之间的联系,重点关注心理灵活性和自我同情在这些关联中的中介作用。该研究纳入了 270 名葡萄牙参与者(慢性病组:n=104;SARS-CoV-2 组:n=166),平均年龄为 36.73 岁,86.6%的样本为女性。结果显示,与 SARS-CoV-2 组相比,慢性病组报告的疾病耻辱感、焦虑和抑郁水平更高。中介分析的结果表明,该模型拟合度非常好,在整个样本中,对焦虑症状的解释程度为 48%,对抑郁症状的解释程度为 45%。大多数参数在两个亚组之间是一致的,除了自我同情与抑郁症状之间的关联,这仅在慢性病亚组中具有统计学意义。在该亚组中,心理灵活性和自我同情均中介了耻辱感和羞耻感与焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关联。在 SARS-CoV-2 亚组中,这些过程中介了与焦虑的关联,而心理灵活性仅中介了抑郁症状。本研究的结果为未来研究提供了方向,可能需要针对慢性病患者和病毒疾病康复队列的成年人的情绪困扰制定或完善个性化心理干预措施。