Afkhami Farzaneh, Ghabraei Sholeh, Hashemi Nasim, Peters Ove A
School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Endod. 2025 Jan;51(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.10.013. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Fear of dentistry, often due to past painful experiences, is a significant barrier preventing patients from visiting dentists. Achieving effective pain control, especially during root canal treatments, is crucial. However, inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs) have a low success rate, influenced by factors such as anxiety, anatomical variations, and technique limitations, leading to anesthesia failure. Although numerous studies have examined the cold test and electric pulp test (EPT) in assessing the success of local anesthesia, no standardized method has been established. This study evaluated the effectiveness of EPT and cold tests in assessing the depth of anesthesia in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar teeth.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis who met the inclusion criteria and exhibited lip numbness. Following the administration of the IANBs and confirmation of lip numbness, cold tests and EPT were performed on all patients. Subsequently, the preparation of the access cavity (gold standard test) was initiated, and patients' responses during cavity preparation were recorded as either "presence of pain or discomfort" or "absence of pain or discomfort," indicating IANB failure and success, respectively. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratios, and accuracy (AC) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each test separately as well as for sequential testing.
IANB failure was determined in 56% of the patients. A comparative analysis of diagnostic tests (cold test and EPT) showed no significant difference in SN, NPV, and AC; however, the cold test had higher SP, PPV, and positive likelihood ratio. Combining cold test and EPT evaluations improved SN, NPV, PPV, and negative likelihood ratio, but SP and AC were similar to EPT alone. No correlation was found between IANB success and patient age, sex, or initial pain.
Despite evidence of lip numbness, a significant number of IANBs failed in cases of painful pulpitis. A positive result from the cold test strongly indicated anesthesia failure. The findings of the current study suggested that when the cold test yielded a negative result, further evaluation with EPT was necessary to confirm anesthetic success and ensure complete pain control.
对牙科治疗的恐惧,通常源于过去的痛苦经历,是阻碍患者看牙医的一个重要障碍。实现有效的疼痛控制,尤其是在根管治疗期间,至关重要。然而,下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)成功率较低,受到焦虑、解剖变异和技术限制等因素影响,导致麻醉失败。尽管众多研究已对冷诊和牙髓电活力测试(EPT)在评估局部麻醉成功与否方面进行了检验,但尚未建立标准化方法。本研究评估了EPT和冷诊在评估下颌第一磨牙有症状不可复性牙髓炎患者麻醉深度方面的有效性。
对50例符合纳入标准且出现唇部麻木的有症状不可复性牙髓炎患者进行了横断面研究。在实施IANB并确认唇部麻木后,对所有患者进行冷诊和EPT。随后开始制备开髓洞形(金标准测试),并将患者在洞形制备过程中的反应记录为“存在疼痛或不适”或“不存在疼痛或不适”,分别表明IANB失败和成功。分别计算每种测试以及序贯测试的敏感性(SN)、特异性(SP)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性和阴性似然比以及95%置信区间的准确性(AC)。
56%的患者被判定IANB失败。诊断测试(冷诊和EPT)的比较分析显示,SN、NPV和AC无显著差异;然而,冷诊的SP、PPV和阳性似然比更高。联合冷诊和EPT评估可提高SN、NPV、PPV和阴性似然比,但SP和AC与单独使用EPT时相似。未发现IANB成功与患者年龄、性别或初始疼痛之间存在相关性。
尽管有唇部麻木的证据,但在疼痛性牙髓炎病例中,大量IANB仍失败。冷诊阳性结果强烈表明麻醉失败。本研究结果表明,当冷诊结果为阴性时,有必要进一步进行EPT评估以确认麻醉成功并确保完全的疼痛控制。