Yale University Department of Psychiatry, United States; Brockton VA Medical Center, United States.
Yale University Department of Psychiatry, United States.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Dec;180:428-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.011. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Depression and some other illnesses are associated with increased self-reference and negative emotion in language. Research findings on lexical patterns in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) have been inconsistent. We conducted two studies to evaluate lexical markers of distress in BPD: First compared to healthy controls (HC), and later compared to Post-Traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients and trauma-exposed controls (TC). Study 1 compared language use in BPD (n = 23) to HC (n = 22). Study 2 featured a new sample comprised of 4 subgroups: BPD (n = 26), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD; n = 17), comorbid BPD + PTSD (n = 22), and one non-psychiatric trauma control group (TC; n = 29). All participants responded to a standardized prompt from an interviewer and language was analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software to assess for self-referential language, negative emotion words, and physical words, as well as several other language signatures of interest. No consistent significant between-group differences were found for LIWC categories of self-reference, negative emotion, or physical words, though negative tone words were significantly more frequent in BPD than non-psychiatric controls in both studies. There were also no consistent differences in sample length (either talking time or word count) or social measures across studies. These data suggest that there are fewer lexical markers of distress in BPD language samples compared to previously reported depression and physical illness samples. Future work using longitudinal approaches to define changes in emotional and cognitive states will be important to clarify the disorder- and state-specificity of lexical markers.
抑郁和其他一些疾病与语言中的自我参照和负面情绪增加有关。边缘型人格障碍 (BPD) 的词汇模式研究结果一直不一致。我们进行了两项研究来评估 BPD 中的痛苦词汇标记:首先与健康对照组 (HC) 进行比较,然后与创伤后应激障碍 (PTSD) 患者和创伤暴露对照组 (TC) 进行比较。研究 1 将 BPD(n=23)与 HC(n=22)的语言使用进行了比较。研究 2 采用了一个新的样本,包括 4 个亚组:BPD(n=26)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD;n=17)、共病 BPD+PTSD(n=22)和一个非精神创伤对照组 (TC;n=29)。所有参与者都对采访者的标准化提示做出了反应,并用语言进行了分析使用语言查询词频(LIWC)软件来评估自我参照语言、负面情绪词和身体词,以及其他一些语言特征的兴趣。在 LIWC 自我参照、负面情绪或身体词的类别中,没有发现一致的显著组间差异,尽管在两项研究中,BPD 中的负面语气词明显比非精神科对照组更频繁。在两项研究中,样本长度(谈话时间或字数)或社会措施也没有一致的差异。这些数据表明,与以前报告的抑郁和身体疾病样本相比,BPD 语言样本中痛苦的词汇标记较少。使用纵向方法来定义情绪和认知状态变化的未来工作对于澄清词汇标记的疾病和状态特异性将是重要的。