• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey.成人机械通气患者的管理:一项全英国范围的调查。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Oct 20;26(2):127-136. doi: 10.1177/17511437241292190. eCollection 2025 May.
2
A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者在重症监护病房中对呼吸支持的偏好调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Nov;67(10):1383-1394. doi: 10.1111/aas.14317. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
3
Perceptions of diagnosis and management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a survey of United Kingdom intensive care physicians.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的诊断与管理认知:英国重症监护医师调查
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Oct 2;14:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-87. eCollection 2014.
4
Intensive care physicians' perceptions of the diagnosis & management of patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure associated with COVID-19: A UK based survey.重症监护医师对与COVID-19相关的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的诊断与管理的看法:一项基于英国的调查。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Aug;23(3):285-292. doi: 10.1177/17511437211002352. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.早期应用气道压力释放通气可能会降低急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气的时间。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1648-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Co-ordinated multidisciplinary intervention to reduce time to successful extubation for children on mechanical ventilation: the SANDWICH cluster stepped-wedge RCT.多学科协调干预以缩短机械通气患儿成功拔管时间:SANDWICH 集群 stepped-wedge RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Mar;26(18):1-114. doi: 10.3310/TCFX3817.
7
Time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) accelerates simulated mucus clearance via increased expiratory flow rate.时间控制自适应通气(TCAV)通过提高呼气流量速率来加速模拟的黏液清除。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 May 16;7(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0250-5.
8
Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus pressure support ventilation (PSV)-A prospective intervention trial comparing haemodynamic parameters in intensive care patients.气道压力释放通气(APRV)与压力支持通气(PSV)-一项比较重症监护患者血流动力学参数的前瞻性干预试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Aug;68(7):932-939. doi: 10.1111/aas.14434. Epub 2024 May 19.
9
High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus continuous positive airway pressure for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care: the FIRST-ABC RCTs.高流量鼻导管治疗与持续气道正压通气用于儿科重症监护中的无创呼吸支持:FIRST-ABC随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(9):1-96. doi: 10.3310/PDBG1495.
10
Survey of respiratory support for intensive care patients in 10 tertiary hospital of Thailand.泰国10家三级医院重症监护患者呼吸支持情况调查。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jan;97 Suppl 1:S8-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a conservative approach to oxygen therapy for invasively ventilated adults in intensive care: Protocol for the UK-ROX trial.评估重症监护病房中侵入性通气成年患者采用保守氧疗方法的临床效果和成本效益:英国ROX试验方案。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Apr 11;25(2):223-230. doi: 10.1177/17511437241239880. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Continuous Versus Intermittent Control Cuff Pressure for Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: An Updated Meta-Analysis.持续与间断控制袖带压力预防呼吸机相关性肺炎:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep;39(9):829-839. doi: 10.1177/08850666241232369. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the mega randomised registry trial research program comparing conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in adults receiving unplanned invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU (Mega-ROX).比较重症监护病房(ICU)中接受非计划性有创机械通气的成人患者保守与宽松氧合目标的大型随机注册试验研究项目的方案和统计分析计划(Mega-ROX)
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 19;24(2):137-149. doi: 10.51893/2022.2.OA4. eCollection 2022 Jun 6.
4
Selective digestive tract decontamination in critically ill adults with acute brain injuries: a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.选择性消化道去污染在伴有急性脑损伤的危重症成人中的应用:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;50(1):56-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07261-y. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
Intermittent versus continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机械通气患者气管套囊间断与持续压力控制的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4283-4294. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16619. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Airway pressure release ventilation: a survey of UK practice.气道压力释放通气:英国实践调查。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;130(1):e25-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.017. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
7
Association Between Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract and In-Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.选择性消化道去污染与机械通气重症监护病房患者院内死亡率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 15;328(19):1922-1934. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.19709.
8
Intensive care physicians' perceptions of the diagnosis & management of patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure associated with COVID-19: A UK based survey.重症监护医师对与COVID-19相关的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的诊断与管理的看法:一项基于英国的调查。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Aug;23(3):285-292. doi: 10.1177/17511437211002352. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
Effectiveness of Continuous Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Control for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Respiratory Infections: An Open-Label Randomized, Controlled Trial.持续控制气管内套囊压力预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的有效性:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 30;74(10):1795-1803. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab724.
10
Closed tracheal suctioning systems in the era of COVID-19: is it time to consider them as a gold standard?COVID-19时代的密闭式气管吸痰系统:是时候将其视为金标准了吗?
J Infect Prev. 2021 Jan;22(1):44-45. doi: 10.1177/1757177420963775. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

成人机械通气患者的管理:一项全英国范围的调查。

Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey.

作者信息

Ward James, Terrington Isis, Preston Katie, Smith Alexander, Roe Thomas, Barnes Jonathan, Allen Emma, Lima Sandra, Cusack Rebecca, Grocott Michael P W, Dushianthan Ahilanandan

机构信息

General Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, Southampton National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Oct 20;26(2):127-136. doi: 10.1177/17511437241292190. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1177/17511437241292190
PMID:39540159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11556611/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is a common and often lifesaving intervention that is utilised in intensive care. However, the practices can vary between centres. Through this national survey we aim to gain more information about different strategies adopted across the UK.

METHODS

All adult intensive care units in the UK were approached to participate. The questionnaire was developed with an electronic survey engine and conducted between 09/11/2023 and 01/04/2024 (Survey Monkey). The survey included questions on ventilator modes, settings, protocols/pathways, rescue strategies, immediate post-extubation period and follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 196 responses from 104 hospitals. The most widely adopted start-up ventilation mode was pressure-regulated volume-controlled mode. For acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), most of respondents reported full (39.8%) or partial compliance (58.1%) with the ARDSnet protocol, with PEEP settings being the commonest deviation. Prone positioning (99.0%), followed by recruitment manoeuvres (91.3%) were commonly used rescue measures during AHRF. APRV (55.7%), inhaled (51.3%) and systemic pulmonary vasodilators (44.1%) were also commonly used. Conservative oxygen targets (SaO of 88%-92%) were commonly adopted (70.6%). As a care bundle, intermittent ETT cuff pressure monitoring was more common (65.5%) than continuous cuff pressure monitoring (20.0%). Propofol and alfentanil were the most common initial sedative and analgesia (99.5% and 56.9%) respectively. Routine volatile anaesthetic use was rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey has shown significant variation of practice in common but crucial elements of management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. We hope the results in our survey highlight potential future areas of research.

COLLABORATORS

South-coast Peri-operative Audit and Research Collaborative (SPARC)Severn Trainee Anaesthetic and Critical Care Research group (STAR)Collaborative research in Anaesthesia in the Northeast (CRANE).

摘要

背景

机械通气是重症监护中常用且常常能挽救生命的干预措施。然而,不同中心的操作方法可能存在差异。通过这项全国性调查,我们旨在获取更多关于英国各地采用的不同策略的信息。

方法

我们联系了英国所有的成人重症监护病房参与调查。问卷通过电子调查引擎编制,并于2023年11月9日至2024年4月1日期间进行(使用Survey Monkey)。调查内容包括呼吸机模式、设置、方案/路径、抢救策略、拔管后即刻阶段及随访等问题。

结果

来自104家医院的196份问卷得到回复。最广泛采用的初始通气模式是压力调节容量控制模式。对于急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF),大多数受访者报告完全(39.8%)或部分(58.1%)遵循ARDSnet方案,其中呼气末正压(PEEP)设置是最常见的偏差。俯卧位通气(99.0%),其次是肺复张手法(91.3%)是AHRF期间常用的抢救措施。气道压力释放通气(APRV,55.7%)、吸入性(51.3%)和全身性肺血管扩张剂(44.1%)也常用。保守的氧目标(动脉血氧饱和度为88% - 92%)普遍采用(70.6%)。作为护理集束,间歇性气管插管套囊压力监测比持续性套囊压力监测更常见(65.5%对20.0%)。丙泊酚和阿芬太尼分别是最常用的初始镇静剂和镇痛药(99.5%和56.9%)。常规使用挥发性麻醉剂很少见。

结论

我们的调查显示,在接受机械通气患者管理的常见但关键要素方面,操作存在显著差异。我们希望我们的调查结果突出未来潜在的研究领域。

合作者

南海岸围手术期审计与研究协作组(SPARC);塞文地区麻醉与重症监护实习研究组(STAR);东北地区麻醉协作研究组(CRANE)