Suppr超能文献

超声引导下真空辅助切除术治疗乳腺良性病变的有效性

Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision for treating benign breast lesions.

作者信息

Tan Xuanni, Xuhong Juncheng, Ai Xiang, Niu Qin, Liu Jing, Zhang Yi, Qi Xiaowei, Jiang Jun

机构信息

Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital Army Medical University Chongqing China.

Key Laboratory of Chongqing Health Commission for Minimally Invasive and Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer Chongqing China.

出版信息

Cancer Innov. 2024 Nov 13;4(1):e158. doi: 10.1002/cai2.158. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound‑guided vacuum-assisted excision (UGVAE) and breast biopsy are widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of both benign and suspicious breast lesions. In this retrospective study, we aimed to determine the safety of UGVAE for benign breast lesions and provide guidance for clinical practice.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical and pathological data of female patients who had undergone UGVAE between January 2015 and December 2017 at our institution. All breast lesions were categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) before performing UGVAE.

RESULTS

In our study cohort, UGVAE was used to resect 10,378 breast lesions from 5789 patients, and selected clinical and histopathological data were analyzed. The most common adverse events were postoperative bleeding (0.24%) and skin hypersensitivity (0.67%). The residual lesion rate was 2.27%. Fibroadenomas accounted for most of the benign lesions (7932 of 10,193; 77.82%). Breast cancer was diagnosed in 150 lesions from 128 patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses showed that older age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.034, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.668-2.480,  < 0.001), higher BI-RADS category (OR = 9.514, 95% CI: 6.790-13.332,  < 0.001), and larger legion size (OR = 1.048, 95% CI: 1.019-1.077,  = 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of breast cancer. Ninety-six patients with breast cancer had undergone follow-up treatment, achieving a 3-year disease-free survival rate of 97.2% and a 3-year overall survival rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

UGVAE is a safe and effective means of removing benign breast lesions, causing minimal postoperative trauma and fewer complications compared with open surgery. Moreover, UGVAE had little impact on the follow-up treatment and survival of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

摘要

背景

超声引导下真空辅助切除(UGVAE)及乳腺活检广泛应用于良性及可疑乳腺病变的诊断与治疗。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在确定UGVAE用于良性乳腺病变的安全性,并为临床实践提供指导。

方法

我们分析了2015年1月至2017年12月在我院接受UGVAE的女性患者的临床和病理数据。在进行UGVAE之前,所有乳腺病变均根据乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)进行分类。

结果

在我们的研究队列中,UGVAE用于切除5789例患者的10378个乳腺病变,并对选定的临床和组织病理学数据进行了分析。最常见的不良事件是术后出血(0.24%)和皮肤过敏(0.67%)。残留病变率为2.27%。纤维腺瘤占良性病变的大多数(10193例中的7932例;77.82%)。在128例患者的150个病变中诊断出乳腺癌。多变量二元逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较大(比值比[OR]=2.034,95%置信区间[CI]:1.668-2.480,P<0.001)、BI-RADS分类较高(OR=9.514,95%CI:6.790-13.332,P<0.001)和病变尺寸较大(OR=1.048,95%CI:1.019-1.077,P=0.001)与乳腺癌发生可能性增加相关。96例乳腺癌患者接受了后续治疗,3年无病生存率为97.2%,3年总生存率为100%。

结论

UGVAE是一种安全有效的切除良性乳腺病变的方法,与开放手术相比,术后创伤小,并发症少。此外,UGVAE对诊断为乳腺癌的患者的后续治疗和生存影响很小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec2/11560381/b5d05cd5bbcc/CAI2-4-e158-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验