Musleh Mohammud, Green Alison, Mankowska Aleks, Viner Catherine, Pilling Rachel
York Hospital, UK.
University of Bradford, UK.
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2024 Nov 11;20(1):219-225. doi: 10.22599/bioj.391. eCollection 2024.
Children with special educational needs are more likely to have vision problems than peers in mainstream education. Reports focus on visual acuity and refraction, overlooking visuoperceptual difficulties, including cerebral visual impairment. This article reports on the feasibility and outcomes of visual function testing performed during in-school visual assessments.
A retrospective chart review was undertaken of children participating in a special school vision programme. The testing strategy included acuity, fields, contrast sensitivity, eye movements, accommodation, stereopsis, visual attention, refraction and a parent-completed questionnaire. The testing method was chosen based on the child's ability to engage with testing.
78 cases were identified (mean age 9.6 years). Low vision (worse than 6/19) was identified in 31%. All six tests of visual function were completed by 44% (mean 5.1; range 2-6). The mean number of atypical responses was 1 (range 0-4). Almost half (49%) showed at least one atypical response, most commonly visual attention (35%) and 25% had atypical eye movements.
Overall, only 20% of children in the special school setting demonstrated a normal response to each test they were able to complete. Acuity testing alone does not demonstrate the atypical visual function of a child with special needs. Using techniques which require minimal cognitive, speech or motor function, a range of visual functions can be elicited during in-school testing. This testing strategy has the advantage of demonstrating areas of visual (dys)function impacting on the child's ability to access learning which can be immediately fed back to teaching staff and carers.
有特殊教育需求的儿童比接受主流教育的同龄人更有可能存在视力问题。报告主要关注视力和屈光不正,而忽视了包括脑性视觉障碍在内的视知觉困难。本文报告了在校视力评估期间进行视觉功能测试的可行性和结果。
对参与特殊学校视力项目的儿童进行回顾性病历审查。测试策略包括视力、视野、对比敏感度、眼球运动、调节、立体视、视觉注意力、屈光不正以及家长填写的问卷。测试方法根据儿童参与测试的能力来选择。
共识别出78例(平均年龄9.6岁)。31%被确定为低视力(视力低于6/19)。44%(平均5.1项;范围2 - 6项)完成了所有六项视觉功能测试。非典型反应的平均数为1(范围0 - 4)。近一半(49%)至少有一项非典型反应,最常见的是视觉注意力(35%),25%有非典型眼球运动。
总体而言,在特殊学校环境中,只有20%的儿童对其能够完成的每项测试都表现出正常反应。仅进行视力测试并不能显示有特殊需求儿童的非典型视觉功能。使用对认知、言语或运动功能要求最低的技术,可以在在校测试期间引出一系列视觉功能。这种测试策略的优点是能够显示影响儿童学习能力的视觉(功能异常)区域,这些信息可以立即反馈给教师和护理人员。