Neill Sara, Joshi Avina, Hoe Emily, Fortin Jennifer, Goldberg Alisa B, Janiak Elizabeth
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Contraception. 2025 Mar;143:110770. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110770. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
The aim of the study was to understand the rates of first-trimester medication and procedural abortion provision, sufficiency in abortion training, and factors associated with abortion provision among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in Massachusetts.
Electronically fielded surveys of a census of OB/GYNs in Massachusetts in 2021 queried physicians on abortion provision, training, practice type, and demographics. Using weighting to account for nonresponse, we generated estimates of the proportion of OB/GYNS providing abortion and used multivariate regression analysis to explore factors associated with abortion provision including practice type, physician sex, and sufficient abortion training.
A total of 198 OB/GYNs responded to the survey (response rate = 29%). Of 158 OB/GYNs not in training, 55% provide some abortion care. More respondents reported sufficient training for surgical abortion (84%) than for medication abortion (43%). The most cited reasons for not providing abortion care were lack of integration into their clinical practice (29%), institutional opposition (27%), or personal opposition to abortion (23%). In multivariate analysis, female physicians were more likely to provide abortion care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.72, 95% CI [1.63-4.55], p < 0.01), and those with insufficient training less likely to provide abortion (aOR 0.18, 95% CI [0.10-0.33], p = 0.01). Those in private practice (aOR 0.47, 95% CI [0.28-0.80], p < 0.01) or "other" practice types (aOR 0.16, 95% CI [0.09-0.27], p < 0.01) were less likely to provide abortion compared to physicians in academic practices.
Only half of OB/GYNs in a state supportive of abortion provide abortion. Despite high patient interest in medication abortion, a majority of OB/GYNs report insufficient training in medication abortion.
This study highlights the need for support from practice, institution, and health system leaders to facilitate the provision of abortion care and the need for increased training among OB/GYNs in medication abortion.
本研究旨在了解马萨诸塞州妇产科医生(OB/GYNs)进行孕早期药物流产和手术流产的比例、流产培训的充足程度以及与提供流产服务相关的因素。
2021年对马萨诸塞州妇产科医生进行普查的电子问卷调查,询问医生关于流产服务、培训、执业类型和人口统计学信息。使用加权法来处理无应答情况,我们估算了提供流产服务的妇产科医生比例,并使用多变量回归分析来探索与提供流产服务相关的因素,包括执业类型、医生性别和充足的流产培训。
共有198名妇产科医生回复了调查(回复率=29%)。在158名非培训中的妇产科医生中,55%提供某种流产护理。报告接受过足够手术流产培训的受访者(84%)多于药物流产培训(43%)。不提供流产护理的最常见原因是缺乏与临床实践的整合(29%)、机构反对(27%)或个人反对流产(23%)。在多变量分析中,女医生更有可能提供流产护理(调整后的优势比[aOR]2.72,95%置信区间[1.63 - 4.55],p < 0.01),而培训不足的医生提供流产服务的可能性较小(aOR 0.18,95%置信区间[0.10 - 0.33],p = 0.01)。与学术执业的医生相比,私人执业(aOR 0.47,95%置信区间[0.28 - 0.80],p < 0.01)或“其他”执业类型(aOR 0.16,95%置信区间[0.09 - 0.27],p < 0.01)的医生提供流产服务的可能性较小。
在一个支持堕胎的州,只有一半的妇产科医生提供堕胎服务。尽管患者对药物流产兴趣浓厚,但大多数妇产科医生报告称药物流产培训不足。
本研究强调了实践、机构和卫生系统领导者提供支持以促进流产护理服务的必要性,以及妇产科医生增加药物流产培训的必要性。