Suppr超能文献

桑兰德:一项关于舒尼替尼与安慰剂及兰瑞肽对比治疗晚期进展性中肠神经内分泌肿瘤患者的随机、双盲GERCOR II期试验。

SUNLAND: a randomized, double-blinded phase II GERCOR trial of sunitinib versus placebo and lanreotide in patients with advanced progressive midgut neuroendocrine tumors.

作者信息

Hammel Pascal, Smith Denis, Afchain Pauline, Dominguez-Tinajero Sophie, Seitz Jean-François, Lievre Astrid, Van Cutsem Eric, Assenat Eric, Di Fiore Frédéric, Peeters Marc, Sobhani Iradj, Raymond Eric, Charton Emilie, Vernerey Dewi, De Mestier Louis, Lombard-Bohas Catherine

机构信息

Digestive and Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Paul Brousse, University of Paris-Saclay, 12 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94800 Villejuif, France.

CHU Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France.

出版信息

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Nov 19;16:17588359241290140. doi: 10.1177/17588359241290140. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed encouraging antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in earlier results from phase I and II trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II trial, patients with a nonresectable grade 1 or 2 midgut progressive NET and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 37.5 mg sunitinib or a placebo, combined with 120 mg lanreotide autogel every 28 days. The planned sample size was 104 patients. The primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The study was stopped early because of insufficient patient recruitment. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 44 patients were enrolled and received sunitinib ( = 22) or placebo ( = 22). The median age was 63.7 years (1-3 range, 56.6-68.1) and 26 patients (59.1%) were male. The main localization was ileum ( = 37, 84.1%) and the majority were grade 2 ( = 25, 56.8%). The median follow-up was 36.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 34.6-48.2). The median PFS was 9.84 months (95% CI 6.8-23.3) with sunitinib and 11.47 months (95% CI 5.4-15.3) with placebo (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80, 95% CI 0.41-1.56,  = 0.51). There was no difference in overall survival between treatment arms (HR = 0.81, (95% CI 0.32-2.01),  = 0.64). The objective response rate was 9.1% with sunitinib and 0.0% with placebo, and 19 patients (86.4%) had stable disease. Thirty-nine patients (88.6%) completed the baseline QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Baseline health-related quality of life level was similar between treatment arms, except for physical and emotional functioning which were higher ( = 0.089) and lower ( = 0.023) in the sunitinib arm, respectively. Trends toward longer time until a definitive deterioration in favor of the sunitinib arm were observed for 10 out of 15 dimensions (HRs < 1), with a significant result for financial difficulties (HR = 0.31, (90% CI 0.10-0.94)). Twenty-seven patients (61.4%) had at least one adverse event grade ⩾3 (sunitinib: 72.7%, placebo: 50.0%), with only one patient grade 4 for hypertension and vomiting. Eleven deaths non-related to treatment occurred (sunitinib arm:  = 5, placebo arm:  = 6).

CONCLUSION

Our study does not provide enough evidence to conclude the role of sunitinib in advanced midgut NETs, primarily due to a lower-than-expected number of enrolled patients. While we cannot entirely rule out the efficacy of sunitinib, lanreotide alone may play a significant role.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2012-001098-94.

摘要

背景

舒尼替尼是一种多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,在I期和II期试验的早期结果中显示,其对晚期中肠神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)患者具有令人鼓舞的抗肿瘤活性和可控制的毒性。

患者和方法

在这项II期试验中,将不可切除的1级或2级中肠进展性NET且东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0 - 1的患者按1:1随机分配,接受37.5mg舒尼替尼或安慰剂治疗,每28天联合120mg兰瑞肽长效凝胶。计划样本量为104例患者。主要结局是研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

由于患者招募不足,研究提前终止。2013年1月至2016年12月期间,共纳入44例患者,其中22例接受舒尼替尼治疗,22例接受安慰剂治疗。中位年龄为63.7岁(范围1 - 3,56.6 - 68.1),26例患者(59.1%)为男性。主要病变部位为回肠(n = 37,84.1%),大多数为2级(n = 25,56.8%)。中位随访时间为36.7个月(95%置信区间(CI)34.6 - 48.2)。舒尼替尼组的中位PFS为9.84个月(95%CI 6.8 - 23.3),安慰剂组为11.47个月(95%CI 5.4 - 15.3)(风险比(HR)= 0.80,95%CI 0.41 - 1.56,P = 0.51)。各治疗组间总生存期无差异(HR = 0.81,(95%CI 0.32 - 2.01),P = 0.64)。舒尼替尼组的客观缓解率为9.1%,安慰剂组为0.0%,19例患者(86.4%)病情稳定。39例患者(88.6%)完成了基线QLQ - C30问卷。除身体功能和情绪功能外,各治疗组基线健康相关生活质量水平相似,舒尼替尼组的身体功能较高(P = 0.089),情绪功能较低(P = 0.023)。在15个维度中的10个维度观察到舒尼替尼组直至明确恶化的时间有延长趋势(HRs < 1),其中经济困难维度有显著差异(HR = 0.31,(90%CI 0.10 - 0.94))。27例患者(61.4%)至少有1次不良事件为3级及以上(舒尼替尼组:72.7%,安慰剂组:50.0%),仅1例患者因高血压和呕吐为4级。发生11例与治疗无关的死亡(舒尼替尼组:n = 5,安慰剂组:n = 6)。

结论

我们的研究没有提供足够的证据来确定舒尼替尼在晚期中肠NETs中的作用,主要原因是入组患者数量低于预期。虽然我们不能完全排除舒尼替尼的疗效,但单独使用兰瑞肽可能起重要作用。

试验注册号

EudraCT:2012 - 001098 - 94

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc9/11574894/4c6cca4b0cf2/10.1177_17588359241290140-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验