Sclar G, Ohzawa I, Freeman R D
Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00237398.
We have studied visual evoked potentials (VEP) in the cat using dichoptically presented sinusoidal gratings. Our goals were to determine if binocular disparity causes differential responses in the VEP, and to examine the effects of monocular deprivation and convergent or divergent strabismus on the degree of binocular summation. Binocular disparity in stimuli causes no regular alterations of visual evoked responses, except at very low spatial frequencies. However, this apparent selectivity is probably due to luminance modulation in the central retina at low frequencies. The insensitivity to binocular disparity establishes that binocular summation in the VEP may be estimated without regard to the relative phase of gratings presented to the two eyes. Binocular summation of the VEP was examined in normal animals. We found that the ratio of the binocularly evoked response to the largest monocular response (averaged across spatial frequency) ranged from 1.27 to 2.12 (4 animals) and had a mean of 1.48. These values fall within the range which has been reported for human subjects. The degree of summation might be expected to be greatly reduced in strabismic and monocularly deprived animals, in which the majority of the cells are functionally monocular. While summation was found to be reduced in 5 esotropic (convergent) animals (range = 1.13-1.24; mean = 1.18) it was approximately normal in three exotropic (divergent) animals (range = 1.29-2.12; mean = 1.61). However, single unit recordings carried out on the same animals show similar reductions of cells that can be driven through either eye for both groups of animals. Recordings from three monocularly deprived animals, on the other hand, show evidence of binocular interaction in the form of suppression. In this case, response amplitudes obtained using binocular stimulation were consistently and substantially smaller than those obtained from the normal eye alone (range = 0.76-0.85; mean = 0.80). We conclude that convergent and divergent strabismus differ substantially in the degree to which binocular summation is exhibited in the VEP, which in the latter condition, is indistinguishable from the normal cat. Monocular deprivation causes an effect which is markedly different from either form of strabismus in that the deprived eye suppresses the response of the normal eye.
我们使用双眼分别呈现正弦光栅的方法,对猫的视觉诱发电位(VEP)进行了研究。我们的目标是确定双眼视差是否会导致VEP出现不同反应,并研究单眼剥夺以及内斜视(会聚性斜视)或外斜视(散开性斜视)对双眼总和程度的影响。刺激中的双眼视差不会引起视觉诱发电位的规律性改变,除非在非常低的空间频率下。然而,这种明显的选择性可能是由于低频时中央视网膜的亮度调制所致。对双眼视差不敏感表明,在估计VEP中的双眼总和时,可以不考虑呈现给两只眼睛的光栅的相对相位。我们在正常动物中检查了VEP的双眼总和情况。我们发现,双眼诱发反应与最大单眼反应的比值(在空间频率上进行平均)在1.27至2.12之间(4只动物),平均值为1.48。这些值落在已报道的人类受试者的范围内。在斜视和单眼剥夺的动物中,预计总和程度会大大降低,因为这些动物中的大多数细胞在功能上是单眼的。虽然在5只内斜视(会聚性)动物中发现总和降低(范围 = 1.13 - 1.24;平均值 = 1.18),但在3只外斜视(散开性)动物中总和大致正常(范围 = 1.29 - 2.12;平均值 = 1.61)。然而,在同一动物上进行的单细胞记录显示,两组动物中通过任何一只眼睛都能驱动的细胞都有类似程度的减少。另一方面,对3只单眼剥夺动物的记录显示,存在以抑制形式表现的双眼相互作用的证据。在这种情况下,使用双眼刺激获得的反应幅度始终且显著小于仅从正常眼睛获得的反应幅度(范围 = 0.76 - 0.85;平均值 = 0.80)。我们得出结论,内斜视和外斜视在VEP中表现出的双眼总和程度上有很大差异,在后一种情况下,与正常猫没有区别。单眼剥夺所产生的影响与任何一种斜视形式都明显不同,即被剥夺的眼睛会抑制正常眼睛的反应。