Doroldi Sara, Piemonti Linda, Valeriani Marina, Larcher Laura, Lenzi Jacopo, Contro Elena
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):2829-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07826-2. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
To identify potential risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section (CS).
We conducted an observational case-control study from 2009 to 2024 at our Tertiary Care Hospital, matching each bladder injury case with four controls. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus, from inception to 2024; eligible studies were case-control studies assessing risk factors for bladder injury during CS. Random-effects regression with the restricted maximum likelihood method was employed for the meta-analysis.
We identified 23 cases of bladder injury out of 15,260 CSs at our hospital, resulting in a rate of 0.15%. Women with bladder injuries were significantly older (p = 0.022), with 47.8% having a history of previous CS, while no significant differences were observed between groups regarding prior abdominal surgery, endometriosis, or body mass index. The systematic review included four case-control studies, whose data were meta-analyzed with our patients, identifying several significant predictors: adhesions (OR 18.6, 95% CI 8.86-39.0), repeated CS (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.02-5.23), emergent procedures (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.71-5.80), failed vaginal birth after cesarean (OR 4.74, 95% CI 2.18-10.3), second stage of labor (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.80-4.29), and macrosomia (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.57).
Key risk factors for cesarean bladder injury include prior CSs, adhesions, second stage of labor, macrosomia, failed VBAC, and emergent procedures. Identifying these risk factors is critical for preoperative assessment and counseling, allowing for better surgical planning and improved outcomes.
确定剖宫产术中膀胱损伤的潜在危险因素。
2009年至2024年在我们的三级医疗中心进行了一项观察性病例对照研究,将每例膀胱损伤病例与四名对照进行匹配。此外,使用MEDLINE、CINAHL和Scopus对从创刊至2024年的文献进行了系统评价和荟萃分析;纳入的研究为评估剖宫产术中膀胱损伤危险因素的病例对照研究。荟萃分析采用限制最大似然法的随机效应回归。
我院15260例剖宫产术中发现23例膀胱损伤,发生率为0.15%。膀胱损伤的女性年龄显著更大(p = 0.022),47.8%有既往剖宫产史,而两组在既往腹部手术、子宫内膜异位症或体重指数方面未观察到显著差异。系统评价纳入了四项病例对照研究,将其数据与我们的患者数据进行荟萃分析,确定了几个显著的预测因素:粘连(比值比18.6,95%置信区间8.86 - 39.0)、再次剖宫产(比值比3.25,95%置信区间2.02 - 5.23)、急诊手术(比值比3.15,95%置信区间1.71 - 5.80)、剖宫产术后阴道试产失败(比值比4.74,95%置信区间2.18 - 10.3)、第二产程(比值比2.78,95%置信区间1.80 - 4.29)和巨大儿(比值比2.64,95%置信区间1.25 - 5.57)。
剖宫产术中膀胱损伤的关键危险因素包括既往剖宫产史、粘连、第二产程、巨大儿、剖宫产术后阴道试产失败和急诊手术。识别这些危险因素对于术前评估和咨询至关重要,有助于更好地进行手术规划并改善结局。