Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 51, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Frankfurt Academy For Arrhythmias (FAFA), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Europace. 2024 Nov 1;26(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae270.
A novel three-dimensional mapping platform combined with a lattice-tip catheter that can toggle between monopolar pulsed field ablation (PFA) and radiofrequency energy delivery was recently launched. So far, the system was predominantly applied in general anaesthesia (GA), not in deep sedation.
Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled, and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and ablation of additional linear lesion sets were performed either in GA or in deep sedation. Pulsed field ablation was applied exclusively to perform ipsilateral PVI. A total of 63 patients (35% female, 75% persistent AF, mean age 64 ± 9 years) were included in the analysis with 23 patients treated in GA and 40 patients in deep sedation. Acute efficacy was comparable in both groups with a PVI rate of 100%. Additional 74 lesion sets were performed in the total cohort. Mean procedure and lab occupancy time in the GA and deep sedation group was 96 ± 24 min vs. 100 ± 23 min (P = 0.52) and 165 ± 40 min vs. 131 ± 35 min (P = 0.0008). Mean dose area product was 489 (216;1093) vs. 452 (272;882) cGycm2 in the GA and the deep sedation group (P = 0.82). There was one conversion from deep sedation to GA. There were no map shifts observed in any group. Pericardial tamponade occurred in one patient of the deep sedation group.
The use of a novel ablation platform in conjunction with a lattice-tip catheter in deep sedation is feasible, effective, and associated with significantly shorter lab occupancy time when compared with GA.
最近推出了一种新型的三维标测平台,结合网格尖端导管,可以在单极脉冲场消融(PFA)和射频能量传递之间切换。到目前为止,该系统主要应用于全身麻醉(GA),而不是深度镇静。
纳入有症状的阵发性或持续性心房颤动(AF)患者,在 GA 或深度镇静下进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)和附加线性消融线的消融。仅应用脉冲场消融来完成同侧 PVI。共有 63 例患者(35%为女性,75%为持续性 AF,平均年龄 64±9 岁)纳入分析,其中 23 例在 GA 下治疗,40 例在深度镇静下治疗。两组的急性疗效相当,PVI 成功率为 100%。在总队列中完成了另外 74 个消融线。GA 和深度镇静组的平均手术和实验室占用时间分别为 96±24min 与 100±23min(P=0.52)和 165±40min 与 131±35min(P=0.0008)。平均剂量面积乘积分别为 489(216;1093)与 452(272;882)cGycm2,GA 和深度镇静组(P=0.82)。有 1 例从深度镇静转为 GA。在任何一组中都没有观察到地图移位。深度镇静组有 1 例发生心包填塞。
在深度镇静下使用新型消融平台结合网格尖端导管是可行的、有效的,与 GA 相比,实验室占用时间显著缩短。