Batta Akash, Singhania Anusha, Sharma Sarit, Gautam Singal, Singla Ankur, Kalsi Harsimran, Mahendru Diksha, Singh Samneet, Goyal Ishaan, Ghosh Hiyanoor, Uppal Aditya, Dhand Nishma, Bansal Namita, Chaudhary Anurag, Wander Gurpreet Singh, Ramakrishnan Sivasubramanian, Mohan Bishav
Department of Cardiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141001, India.
Department of Cardiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, 141001, India.
Indian Heart J. 2024 Nov-Dec;76(6):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2024.11.249. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
Hypertension (HTN) management guidelines recommend home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) as an important tool for BP control. Limited data exists on HBPM epidemiology among people with HTN and their caregivers in the Indian context.
The current study was conducted across three North Indian centres to evaluate the prevalence, training and technique of HBPM among people with HTN and their caregivers. People with diagnosed HTN (>3 months duration) and their caregivers, were screened and their HBPM use was evaluated. HBPM practices were assessed by observing participants measuring BP using a pre-validated, structured 16-point observational checklist. HBPM knowledge was assessed using a 19-point self-administered questionnaire based on the most recent AHA guidelines. Responses were graded and classified based on quartiles.
A total of 2750 participants were screened, of which 2588 (2070 from urban and 518 from rural areas) were included. A total of 468 (18.1 %) were using HBPM. The proportion of respondents using HBPM was 20.5 % (424/2070) in urban, and 8.5 % (44/518) in rural areas. Only 24.7 % (n = 116) of the 468 participants (236 patients and 232 caregivers) using HBPM at home recalled ever receiving training from any healthcare workers. The majority (75.2 %, 352/468) of participants reported learning HBPM themselves through observation, videos, and reading. In HBPM practice assessment, 15.9 % of people with HTN (37/232) vs 5.9 % caregivers (14/236) scored excellent (score >75 %). In HPBM knowledge assessment, 0.4 % of people with HTN (1/232) vs no caregivers scored excellent. HPBM practices were better than knowledge, with mean scores of 62.3 ± 13.1 % and 40.1 ± 16.2 % respectively. Higher education level was associated with improved patient knowledge (p = 0.041), but not practices (p = 0.225).
There is need for more robust training on HBPM to enable people from all backgrounds to better manage their HTN, especially in rural areas. Education is not a barrier to learning good HBPM technique.
高血压(HTN)管理指南推荐家庭血压监测(HBPM)作为控制血压的重要工具。在印度背景下,关于高血压患者及其护理人员的家庭血压监测流行病学数据有限。
本研究在印度北部的三个中心进行,以评估高血压患者及其护理人员的家庭血压监测患病率、培训情况和技术。对确诊为高血压(病程>3个月)的患者及其护理人员进行筛查,并评估他们使用家庭血压监测的情况。通过观察参与者使用预先验证的、结构化的16点观察清单测量血压来评估家庭血压监测实践。基于最新的美国心脏协会指南,使用19点的自填式问卷评估家庭血压监测知识。根据四分位数对回答进行评分和分类。
共筛查了2750名参与者,其中2588名(2070名来自城市,518名来自农村)被纳入研究。共有468名(18.1%)使用家庭血压监测。城市地区使用家庭血压监测的受访者比例为20.5%(424/2070),农村地区为8.5%(44/518)。在468名在家中使用家庭血压监测的参与者(236名患者和232名护理人员)中,只有24.7%(n = 116)回忆起曾接受过任何医护人员的培训。大多数(75.2%,352/468)参与者报告通过观察、视频和阅读自学家庭血压监测。在家庭血压监测实践评估中,15.9%的高血压患者(37/232)与5.9%的护理人员(14/236)得分优秀(得分>75%)。在家庭血压监测知识评估中,0.4%的高血压患者(1/232)得分优秀,护理人员无一人得分优秀。家庭血压监测实践优于知识,平均得分分别为62.3±13.1%和40.1±16.2%。较高的教育水平与患者知识的提高相关(p = 0.041),但与实践无关(p = 0.225)。
需要对家庭血压监测进行更有力的培训,以使所有背景的人都能更好地管理自己的高血压,特别是在农村地区。教育不是学习良好家庭血压监测技术的障碍。