Tollefson Luke V, LaPrade Christopher M, LaPrade Robert F
Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2492-2495. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.061. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
Recent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) research focuses on risk factors for ACL graft failure and techniques and augmentations to limit failure. One of the most recognized risk factors is sagittal malalignment in the form of high posterior tibial slope (PTS), especially PTS ≥12°, which leads to increased force through the ACL and ACL graft. To reduce the risk associated with increased PTS, lateral augmentation techniques, typically either a lateral extra-articular tenodesis or an anterolateral ligament reconstruction, improve clinical outcomes, and the authors preferred graft choice, particularly in such cases, is bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Furthermore, in revision cases, there exists a strong argument to perform a slope reducing osteotomy to correct bony malalignment which, if left untreated, could lead to ACL graft failure. Slope-reducing osteotomies are reported to significantly decrease anterior tibial translation and forces on the ACL graft. Coronal malalignment is also a risk factor for ACL failure (although not as extensively studied as sagittal alignment). Both varus and valgus alignment of the knee can lead to increased forces through the ACL or ACL graft compared with knees in neutral alignment, and workup requires proper lateral and long-leg anteroposterior radiographs to determine sagittal and coronal alignment and guide treatment algorithms. Recent research shows that decreased medial proximal tibial angle of the knee (increasing varus alignment of the tibia) may delay graft maturation. However, there is yet to be a consensus about what exactly contributes to ACL graft failure in the coronal plane and what is the best treatment option, especially in the primary setting when an osteotomy is not indicated. Again, we recommend bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft as our preferred graft choice unless contraindicated by skeletal immaturity.
近期前交叉韧带(ACL)的研究聚焦于ACL移植物失败的风险因素以及限制失败的技术和增强方法。最广为人知的风险因素之一是以高胫骨后倾坡度(PTS)形式存在的矢状面排列不齐,尤其是PTS≥12°,这会导致通过ACL和ACL移植物的力量增加。为降低与PTS增加相关的风险,外侧增强技术,通常是外侧关节外腱固定术或前外侧韧带重建,可改善临床结果,并且在这种情况下作者更倾向的移植物选择是髌腱骨自体移植物。此外,在翻修病例中,有充分理由进行降低坡度的截骨术以纠正骨排列不齐,否则可能导致ACL移植物失败。据报道,降低坡度的截骨术可显著减少胫骨前移和ACL移植物上的力量。冠状面排列不齐也是ACL失败的一个风险因素(尽管不如矢状面排列研究广泛)。与中立位排列的膝关节相比,膝关节的内翻和外翻排列均可导致通过ACL或ACL移植物的力量增加,检查需要合适的外侧和长腿前后位X线片以确定矢状面和冠状面排列并指导治疗方案。近期研究表明,膝关节内侧胫骨近端角度减小(胫骨内翻排列增加)可能会延迟移植物成熟。然而,对于冠状面究竟是什么导致ACL移植物失败以及最佳治疗选择是什么,尤其是在不适合进行截骨术的初次治疗情况下,尚未达成共识。同样,我们推荐髌腱骨自体移植物作为首选移植物,除非因骨骼未成熟而禁忌使用。