McMichael Ali, Weller Jamie, Li Xilong, Hatton Laura, Zia Ayesha, Raman Lakshmi
Department of Pediatrics, Phoenix Children's, Department of Child Health, University of Arizona School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.
Division of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Jan 1;26(1):e86-e94. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003642. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
To test feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with an endpoint of time at goal anticoagulation in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) randomized to receive bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin.
Open-label pilot RCT (NCT03318393) carried out 2018-2021.
Single-center quaternary U.S. pediatric hospital.
Children 0 days to younger than 18 years old supported with ECMO in the PICU or cardiovascular ICU.
Randomization to bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin while on ECMO.
Sixteen patients were randomized to bivalirudin, and 14 patients were randomized to heparin. There was no difference in the primary outcome, time spent at goal anticoagulation, for patients randomized to bivalirudin compared with those randomized to heparin. While hemorrhagic complications were similar between study groups, thrombotic complications were higher with six of 16 patients in the bivalirudin group having one or more circuit changes compared with 0 of 14 patients in heparin group (mean difference, 37.5% [95% CI, 8.7-61.4%]; p = 0.02). Patients in the bivalirudin group received less packed RBC transfusions vs. those receiving heparin (median [interquartile range], 6.3 mL/kg/d [2.5-8.4 mL/kg/d] vs. 12.2 mL/kg/d [5.5-14.5 mL/kg/d]; p = 0.02).
In this single-center pilot RCT carried out 2018-2021, we found that the test of anticoagulation therapy of bivalirudin vs. heparin during ECMO was feasible. Larger multicenter studies are required to further assess the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin for pediatric ECMO.
在接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗的儿童中开展一项随机对照试验(RCT),以达到目标抗凝时间为终点,比较比伐卢定与普通肝素的疗效,检验该试验的可行性。
2018年至2021年开展的开放标签试点RCT(NCT03318393)。
美国一家单中心四级儿科医院。
年龄在0天至18岁以下,在儿科重症监护室(PICU)或心血管重症监护室接受ECMO支持的儿童。
在接受ECMO治疗期间,随机分配接受比伐卢定或普通肝素治疗。
16例患者被随机分配接受比伐卢定治疗,14例患者被随机分配接受肝素治疗。与接受肝素治疗的患者相比,接受比伐卢定治疗的患者在主要结局指标(达到目标抗凝的时间)上没有差异。虽然研究组之间出血并发症相似,但血栓形成并发症更高,比伐卢定组16例患者中有6例发生一次或多次循环回路改变,而肝素组14例患者中0例发生(平均差异,37.5%[95%CI,8.7 - 61.4%];p = 0.02)。与接受肝素治疗的患者相比,接受比伐卢定治疗的患者输注的红细胞浓缩液更少(中位数[四分位间距],6.3 mL/kg/d[2.5 - 8.4 mL/kg/d]对12.2 mL/kg/d[5.5 - 14.5 mL/kg/d];p = 0.02)。
在2018年至2021年开展的这项单中心试点RCT中,我们发现ECMO期间比伐卢定与肝素抗凝治疗的试验是可行的。需要开展更大规模的多中心研究,以进一步评估比伐卢定用于儿童ECMO的安全性和有效性。