Suppr超能文献

替雷利珠单抗与索拉非尼作为不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本效益:中国、美国和欧洲的比较分析

Cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative analysis in China, the United States and Europe.

作者信息

Sun Yuyang, Xu Kai, Yao Hongting, Wei Jingxuan, Ding Baolong, Qian Xiaodan, Su Dan, Gong Jinhong, Shang Jingjing, Zhang Lingli, Li Xin

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Science and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213004, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Feb;47(1):196-209. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01824-9. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tislelizumab has emerged as a promising therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), although its economic viability across different healthcare systems remains uncertain.

AIM

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for uHCC from the perspectives of the healthcare systems of China, the United States and Europe.

METHOD

A partitioned survival model was developed using data from the RATIONALE-301 trial. Costs and utilities were sourced from local healthcare charges, publicly available databases, and published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were assessed. Price simulations were conducted to identify cost-effective pricing within established willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

Tislelizumab (priced at $1587.45/100 mg) was cost-effective in the US at a WTP threshold of $150,000, with an ICER of $108,812.52. In Europe, tislelizumab was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $100,000, with an ICER of $94,880.40. For $186.18/100 mg in China, tislelizumab was cost-effective with an ICER of $14,206.80. Price simulation analyses showed that in the US, tislelizumab was favored when priced below $1438.30/100 mg at a $100,000 WTP threshold and below $2284.56/100 mg at a $150,000 WTP threshold. In Europe, it was favored below $1661.82/100 mg and $2501.93/100 mg for the same thresholds. In China, tislelizumab was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $38,184 when priced below $582.11/100 mg.

CONCLUSION

Tislelizumab presents a cost-effective first-line treatment option for uHCC, potentially supporting its broader adoption in health policy. Future research should focus on long-term efficacy and real-world data to further validate these findings.

摘要

背景

替雷利珠单抗已成为不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)的一种有前景的治疗方法,尽管其在不同医疗体系中的经济可行性仍不确定。

目的

本研究从中国、美国和欧洲医疗体系的角度比较了替雷利珠单抗与索拉非尼作为uHCC一线治疗的成本效益。

方法

使用RATIONALE-301试验的数据建立了一个分段生存模型。成本和效用数据来自当地医疗费用、公开可用的数据库以及已发表的文献。评估了总成本、质量调整生命年和增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了价格模拟,以确定在既定支付意愿(WTP)阈值内具有成本效益的定价。进行了敏感性和情景分析以测试模型的稳健性。

结果

在美国,替雷利珠单抗(定价为1587.45美元/100毫克)在150,000美元的WTP阈值下具有成本效益,ICER为108,812.52美元。在欧洲,替雷利珠单抗在100,000美元的WTP阈值下具有成本效益,ICER为94,880.40美元。在中国,替雷利珠单抗定价为186.18美元/100毫克时具有成本效益,ICER为14,206.80美元。价格模拟分析表明,在美国,当WTP阈值为100,000美元时,替雷利珠单抗定价低于1438.30美元/100毫克,以及当WTP阈值为150,000美元时定价低于2284.56美元/100毫克时更受青睐。在欧洲,对于相同阈值,定价低于1661.82美元/100毫克和2501.93美元/100毫克时更受青睐。在中国,当定价低于582.11美元/100毫克时,替雷利珠单抗在38,184美元的WTP阈值下具有成本效益。

结论

替雷利珠单抗是uHCC一种具有成本效益的一线治疗选择,可能支持其在卫生政策中更广泛的应用。未来的研究应关注长期疗效和真实世界数据,以进一步验证这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验