Mwangoka Grace W, Ali Ali M, Mrisho Mwifadhi, Mkopi Abdallah, Mahende Muhidin, Msuya Hajirani M, Temu Silas G, Kazyoba Paul, Mihayo Michael G, Juma Omar, Hamad Ali, Jongo Said A, Lweno Omar, Tumbo Anneth, Mswata Sara S, Hoppe Anne, Dani Pallavi, Abdulla Salim
Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
National Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Nov 26;112(4_Suppl):26-36. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0732. Print 2025 Apr 1.
The rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is critical for comprehensive public health response strategies, and self-testing with antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) presents opportunities to test in hard-to-reach communities. Therefore, we evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and uptake of Ag-RDT self-testing at the community level in Tanzania. From June to October 2022, symptomatic individuals or those with recent contact with a known or suspected COVID-19 patient were offered assisted testing and self-testing within mining communities and at transport hubs. This study included a cross-sectional survey before and after implementation. Participants were assessed for their acceptability and uptake of the nasal Ag-RDT self-test and their preference for nasal Ag-RDT self-testing. The survey data were collected in Open Data Kit, whereas the Ag-RDT results in the community were recorded by using the COVISUSPECT Mobile Application. Data analysis was performed by using STATA and R Statistical Software. A total of 538 individuals were screened, and 454 (84.4%) consented to be tested. The preference for self-testing was relatively low (33%), and the majority of participants (67%) opted to be assisted by a healthcare professional. Of the participants who opted for testing, 149 (32.8%) were able to self-test. Generally, there was no major difference in the various assessed parameters between the baseline and end-line surveys. The results from fitting multiple logistic regression indicated that after controlling for age, participants living in Dodoma were significantly less likely to opt for self-testing (odds ratio = 0.54; P-value = 0.023) compared with those living in Dar es Salaam. There was no significant difference in self-testing between participants living in Mara and those living in Dar es Salaam (odds ratio = 0.7; P-value = 0.179). After controlling for region, older (≥40 years) participants were significantly less likely to self-test compared with participants aged 18 to <40 years (odds ratio = 0.47; P-value = 0.002). The intervention was well-accepted in all areas in which Ag-RDTs were deployed. Our findings can therefore support the Ministry of Health by increasing accessibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing in the hard-to-reach communities in response to the next COVID-19 wave.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的快速诊断对于全面的公共卫生应对策略至关重要,而使用抗原快速诊断检测(Ag-RDT)进行自我检测为在难以到达的社区开展检测提供了机会。因此,我们评估了坦桑尼亚社区层面Ag-RDT自我检测的可接受性、可行性和采用情况。2022年6月至10月,有症状的个体或近期与已知或疑似COVID-19患者有过接触的个体在矿区社区和交通枢纽接受了辅助检测和自我检测。本研究包括实施前后的横断面调查。评估参与者对鼻腔Ag-RDT自我检测的可接受性和采用情况,以及他们对鼻腔Ag-RDT自我检测的偏好。调查数据通过开放数据工具包收集,而社区中的Ag-RDT结果则使用COVISUSPECT移动应用程序记录。使用STATA和R统计软件进行数据分析。共筛查了538人,454人(84.4%)同意接受检测。自我检测的偏好相对较低(33%),大多数参与者(67%)选择由医疗保健专业人员提供帮助。在选择检测的参与者中,149人(32.8%)能够进行自我检测。总体而言,基线调查和终末调查之间的各项评估参数没有重大差异。多元逻辑回归分析结果表明,在控制年龄后,与居住在达累斯萨拉姆的参与者相比,居住在多多马的参与者选择自我检测的可能性显著降低(比值比=0.54;P值=0.023)。居住在马拉的参与者和居住在达累斯萨拉姆的参与者在自我检测方面没有显著差异(比值比=0.7;P值=0.179)。在控制地区因素后,年龄较大(≥40岁)的参与者与18至<40岁的参与者相比,自我检测的可能性显著降低(比值比=0.47;P值=0.002)。在所有部署Ag-RDT的地区,该干预措施都得到了很好的接受。因此,我们的研究结果可以通过增加在难以到达的社区进行严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测的可及性,来支持卫生部应对下一波COVID-19疫情。