Zoonotic Diseases and One Health group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Salamanca, campus Miguel Unamuno, Salamanca, 37007, Spain.
Centre for Environmental Studies and Rural Dynamization (CEADIR), University of Salamanca, campus Miguel Unamuno, Salamanca, 37007, Spain.
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Nov 26;20(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04383-3.
Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are vector-borne bacterial diseases produced by intracellular rickettsial species of the genus Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma spp. (A. platys and A. phagocytophilum) have reported cases of zoonotic transmision and are the main bacterial agents of canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. They normally present an asymptomatic or mild course in domestic and wild animals with some lethal cases reported. The main vector of these diseases in Europe are the castor bean tick (Ixodes ricinus) and the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus), although only in the latter, the main host is the domestic dogs. The aim of this work is to apply an integrative approach to convert ecological niche models (ENMs) into potential transmission risk models and understand the relative contribution of the two potential vectors (R. sanguineus and I. ricinus) to spread both diseases in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands.
Two ENMs meeting all criteria were successfully generated for R. sanguineus and I. ricinus with human footprint being the most relevant explanatory variable. The novelty of the study lies in the combination of independent ENMs for both species to estimate the disease transmission risk of specific bacteria (E. canis, A. platys and A. phagocytophilum). Only the transmission risk maps that had higher contribution of R. sanguineus than I. ricinus showed relevant and positive significant correlations between risk and seroprevalence in either of the two species of bacteria (R ≥ 0.4; p < 0.05). Regarding Anaplasma spp., the map having 10% contribution of I. ricinus (10I) and 90% of R. sanguineus (90R) inferred 47.4% of infected dogs in very high-risk areas. In the case of E. canis, the model showing a proportion of 25I-75R showed better validation power (53.4% of infected dogs in very high-risk areas).
The validation approach used in this study produced a good approximation to understand the relative contribution of the two tick species in bacterial disease transmission in dogs in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Rhipicephalus sanguineus appears as the main transmitter of both diseases in the study area (90% and 75% for anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis respectively), in accordance with its higher abundance and host preference. This estimate may help veterinary staff, clinicians and owners to optimize the control of these diseases in certain vulnerable areas, and thus reduce the risk of infection in risk areas.
埃立克体病和无形体病是由细胞内立克次体属的埃立克体和无形体引起的虫媒细菌性疾病。犬埃立克体病和无形体病的主要细菌病原体是犬埃立克体和无形体属(A. platys 和 A. phagocytophilum)。这些疾病在欧洲的主要传播媒介是蓖麻蜱(Ixodes ricinus)和褐犬蜱(Rhipicephalus sanguineus),尽管后者主要宿主是家养犬。本研究旨在应用综合方法将生态位模型(ENMs)转化为潜在传播风险模型,并了解这两种潜在传播媒介(R. sanguineus 和 I. ricinus)对伊比利亚半岛和巴利阿里群岛传播这两种疾病的相对贡献。
成功生成了满足所有标准的 R. sanguineus 和 I. ricinus 的两个 ENM,人类足迹是最相关的解释变量。本研究的新颖之处在于,将两种独立的物种 ENM 结合起来,以估计特定细菌(E. canis、A. platys 和 A. phagocytophilum)的疾病传播风险。只有 R. sanguineus 比 I. ricinus 的贡献更高的传播风险图显示了两种细菌中任一种的风险与血清阳性率之间存在显著正相关(R≥0.4;p<0.05)。关于无形体属,贡献 10% I. ricinus(10I)和 90% R. sanguineus(90R)的地图推断出高风险地区 47.4%的感染犬。对于 E. canis,显示比例为 25I-75R 的模型显示出更好的验证能力(高风险地区 53.4%的感染犬)。
本研究使用的验证方法很好地近似理解了两种蜱在伊比利亚半岛和巴利阿里群岛犬中细菌病传播的相对贡献。在研究区域,Rhipicephalus sanguineus 似乎是这两种疾病的主要传播者(分别为 90%和 75%的无形体病和埃立克体病),这与它更高的丰度和宿主偏好相符。这种估计可以帮助兽医人员、临床医生和主人在某些脆弱地区优化这些疾病的控制,从而降低感染风险地区的感染风险。