Department of Health Science, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Department of Health Science, Frederick University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:1939-1948. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.028. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although physiotherapy remains one of the main interventions suggested for the treatment of Iliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS), the appropriate physiotherapy and its effectiveness on this injury haven't been fully defined yet. This study aims to investigate which are the appropriate physiotherapy interventions and their effectiveness in adults with ITBS METHODS: PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews and Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist were used. Medline, Cinahl, SPORTDiscuss, and Pascal Archive databases were searched to identify trials involving patients with ITBS and healthy adults who underwent any form of physiotherapy with or without medication, compared with those who underwent any form of physiotherapy with or without medication or no treatment. The methodological quality of studies was assessed with the PEDro scale.
Seven studies, with a total sample of 187 subjects, met the inclusion criteria. Physiotherapy interventions like physical modalities, manual therapies, exercises, and multimodal interventions are effective with or without medication in the improvement of patients' pain, functionality, muscle strength, and iliotibial band stiffness. However, a treatment plan with multimodal interventions and medication may increase the patients' iliotibial band stiffness, and deep transverse frictions aren't recommended for the management of patients' pain and functionality. The overall reporting quality of interventions was poor. The small number of studies and their methodological quality don't allow for firm conclusions.
There is moderate-evidence to suggest that physiotherapy with or without medication is effective in adults with ITBS. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to elucidate the efficacy and proper parameters of physiotherapy in these patients.
背景/目的:尽管物理疗法仍然是治疗髂胫束综合征(ITBS)的主要干预措施之一,但适当的物理疗法及其在这种损伤中的效果尚未完全确定。本研究旨在探讨哪些是适当的物理治疗干预措施及其对 ITBS 成人患者的有效性。
使用 PRISMA 扩展的综述和干预描述与复制清单模板。检索 Medline、Cinahl、SPORTDiscuss 和 Pascal 档案数据库,以确定涉及 ITBS 患者和接受任何形式的物理治疗(无论是否有药物治疗)的健康成年人的试验,与接受任何形式的物理治疗(无论是否有药物治疗或无治疗)的患者相比。使用 PEDro 量表评估研究的方法学质量。
有 7 项研究,共 187 名受试者符合纳入标准。物理治疗干预措施,如物理疗法、手法治疗、运动和多模式干预,在改善患者疼痛、功能、肌肉力量和髂胫束僵硬方面,无论是否有药物治疗,都是有效的。然而,多模式干预和药物治疗的治疗方案可能会增加患者的髂胫束僵硬,并且不建议使用深层横摩擦来治疗患者的疼痛和功能。干预措施的整体报告质量较差。研究数量少且方法学质量不高,无法得出明确的结论。
有中等证据表明,无论是否有药物治疗,物理疗法对 ITBS 成人患者有效。需要设计良好的随机对照试验来阐明这些患者中物理疗法的疗效和适当参数。