• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规与非接触隔离技术在原发性结肠癌切除术中的长期随访(JCOG1006):随机临床试验。

Long-term follow-up of the conventional versus no-touch isolation technique for resection of primary colon cancer (JCOG1006): randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae133.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae133
PMID:39602807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1006 was a phase III trial of patients with clinical T3/T4 colon cancer comparing the no-touch isolation technique ('No Touch') with the conventional technique ('Conventional'). The planned primary analysis at 3 years failed to confirm the superiority of the No Touch over the 'Conventional'. The present study aimed to compare the 'No Touch' and 'Conventional' using long-term (6-year) follow-up data.

METHODS

Patients aged 20-80 years who had a clinical classification of T3-4, N0-2, and M0 with histologically proven colon cancer were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to undergo open surgery using 'Conventional' or 'No Touch' techniques. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival.

RESULTS

In total, 853 patients from 30 institutions were assigned to the 'Conventional' (427) or 'No Touch' (426) groups between June 2011 and November 2015. The 6-year disease-free survival was 70.3% and 69.4% for 'Conventional' and 'No Touch' arms respectively (HR 1.030; 95% c.i. 0.813 to 1.304; one-sided P = 0.60). The 6-year overall survival was 89.4% and 86.6% respectively (HR 1.276; 95% c.i. 0.902 to 1.807). The 6-year relapse-free survival was 78.9% and 75.0% respectively (HR 1.209; 95% c.i. 0.920 to 1.589). The 6-year liver relapse-free survival was 85.1% and 80.2% respectively (HR 1.311; 95% c.i. 0.961 to 1.787).

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up data did not support the superiority of 'No Touch' over 'Conventional' technique in patients with stages II and III colon cancer. These study findings indicate that the conventional technique is still standard surgery for managing colon cancers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000004957.

摘要

背景

日本临床肿瘤学组(JCOG)1006 是一项 III 期临床试验,纳入了临床 T3/T4 结肠癌患者,比较了无接触隔离技术(“无接触”)与传统技术(“常规”)。3 年的计划主要分析未能证实无接触优于常规。本研究旨在使用 6 年随访数据比较“无接触”和“常规”。

方法

纳入年龄 20-80 岁、临床分类 T3-4、N0-2、M0 且组织学证实为结肠癌的患者,按 1:1 随机分配至接受开放手术的常规或无接触技术组。主要终点为无病生存。

结果

2011 年 6 月至 2015 年 11 月,来自 30 个机构的 853 例患者被分配至常规(427 例)或无接触(426 例)组。常规组和无接触组的 6 年无病生存率分别为 70.3%和 69.4%(HR 1.030;95%CI 0.813 至 1.304;单侧 P=0.60)。6 年总生存率分别为 89.4%和 86.6%(HR 1.276;95%CI 0.902 至 1.807)。6 年无复发生存率分别为 78.9%和 75.0%(HR 1.209;95%CI 0.920 至 1.589)。6 年肝无复发生存率分别为 85.1%和 80.2%(HR 1.311;95%CI 0.961 至 1.787)。

结论

长期随访数据不支持无接触优于常规技术在 II 期和 III 期结肠癌患者中的应用。这些研究结果表明,常规技术仍然是治疗结肠癌的标准手术。

临床试验注册号

UMIN000004957。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/62a1d042a175/zrae133f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/542b03b377e6/zrae133f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/cdcc18490d10/zrae133f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/24db7988a4f8/zrae133f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/62a1d042a175/zrae133f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/542b03b377e6/zrae133f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/cdcc18490d10/zrae133f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/24db7988a4f8/zrae133f3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/559b/11602131/62a1d042a175/zrae133f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up of the conventional versus no-touch isolation technique for resection of primary colon cancer (JCOG1006): randomized clinical trial.常规与非接触隔离技术在原发性结肠癌切除术中的长期随访(JCOG1006):随机临床试验。
BJS Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae133.
2
The Conventional Technique Versus the No-touch Isolation Technique for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Colon Cancer (JCOG1006): A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.常规技术与非接触隔离技术在结肠癌患者原发肿瘤切除中的比较(JCOG1006):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、III 期临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):849-855. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005241. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对右半结肠癌的新型手辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 26;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2084-3.
4
Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 解剖治疗 II 期或 III 期结肠癌的生存结局(JCOG0404):一项 III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30207-2. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
5
A randomized controlled trial of the conventional technique versus the no-touch isolation technique for primary tumor resection in patients with colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1006.一项对比常规技术与无接触隔离技术用于结直肠癌患者原发肿瘤切除的随机对照临床试验:日本临床肿瘤学组研究 JCOG1006。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;44(1):97-100. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt156. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
6
Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 清扫术治疗 II/III 期结肠癌的随机对照临床试验的短期手术结果:日本临床肿瘤学组研究 JCOG0404。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000499.
7
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
8
A randomised-controlled trial of 1-year adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil versus surgery alone in stage II colon cancer: SACURA trial.Ⅱ期结肠癌术后替加氟尿嘧啶口服辅助化疗 1 年与单纯手术的随机对照临床试验:SACURA 试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jun;96:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
9
The Radical Extent of lymphadenectomy - D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.淋巴结清扫的根治范围——D2 清扫术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的全结肠系膜切除术治疗右侧结肠癌(RELARC)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 8;17(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1710-9.
10
Capecitabine versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (JCOG0910): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial.卡培他滨与 S-1 作为 III 期结直肠癌患者的辅助化疗(JCOG0910):一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机、III 期、多中心试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;3(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30297-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Could the top-down right hemicolectomy be an easier alternative to the classic medial-to-lateral approach in obese patients? A case report with video example.对于肥胖患者,自上而下的右半结肠切除术会是比经典的由内侧向外侧入路更简便的选择吗?一则带有视频示例的病例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Nov;100:107752. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107752. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
The Conventional Technique Versus the No-touch Isolation Technique for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Colon Cancer (JCOG1006): A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.常规技术与非接触隔离技术在结肠癌患者原发肿瘤切除中的比较(JCOG1006):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、III 期临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):849-855. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005241. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
"Caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the superior mesenteric artery for the treatment of right colon cancer: is it more in line with the principle of oncology?“尾侧至头侧”加“动脉优先”技术联合肠系膜上动脉右侧中线D3以外淋巴结清扫术治疗右半结肠癌:是否更符合肿瘤学原则?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4089-4100. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07171-5. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
4
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.日本结直肠癌学会(JSCCR)2019 年结直肠癌治疗指南。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):1-42. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
5
Impact of medial-to-lateral vs lateral-to-medial approach on short-term and cancer-related outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中从内侧到外侧与从外侧到内侧入路对短期及癌症相关结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Dec 28;26:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.12.011. eCollection 2018 Feb.
6
Open Right Hemicolectomy:Lateral to Medial or Medial to Lateral Approach?右半结肠切除术:由外侧向内侧还是由内侧向外侧入路?
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 31;10(12):e0145175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145175. eCollection 2015.
7
Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection.标准化的由内侧向外侧入路对腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术预后的影响。
World J Surg. 2009 Oct;33(10):2177-82. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0173-5.
8
Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer.腹腔镜由内侧向外侧入路治疗右侧结肠癌根治术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jun;14(6):1878-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9153-2. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
9
Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer.卡培他滨作为Ⅲ期结肠癌的辅助治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 30;352(26):2696-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043116.
10
Physiologic resection of the right colon.右半结肠的生理性切除
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1952 Jun;94(6):722-6.