Schlicht Larissa, Wendsche Johannes, Melzer Marlen, Tschetsche Letizia, Rösler Ulrike
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Dresden, Germany; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Dresden, Germany.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Jan;161:104950. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104950. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
Digital technologies promise to reduce nurses' workload and increase quality of care. However, considering the plethora of single and review studies published to date, maintaining a comprehensive overview of digital technologies' impact on nursing and effectively utilizing available evidence is challenging.
This review aims (i) to map published reviews on digital nursing technologies, based on their aims and the specific technologies investigated, to synthesize evidence on how these technologies' uses is associated with (ii) nurses' work-related and organizational factors, professional behavior, and health and work safety and (iii) ethically relevant outcomes for people in need of care.
Preregistered overview of reviews (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42023389751).
SETTING(S): We searched for systematic reviews in eight databases, five key journals, and reference lists of included reviews published in English until May 21, 2024.
We used the AMSTAR 2 checklist to assess the methodological quality of included reviews reporting associations with nursing outcomes. The extracted data were analyzed by their frequency and narratively synthesized.
We identified 213 reviews on digital technologies' uses in the nursing sector. Most of these focused on information and communication technologies. The most frequently reported research objectives encompass technology usage and/or general experiences with it and technology-related consequences for care recipients. Regarding work-related and organizational factors, beneficial impacts were found for the execution of nursing tasks, information management and job control. Depending on the technology type, reviews reported mixed effects for documentation activities, communication/collaboration and mainly negative effects on nurses' workload. Concerning occupational safety and health-related and further nurse outcomes, reviews reported mostly positive effects on nurses' job satisfaction and professional competence. Adverse effects related to mental and physical strain, such as increased frustration, fatigue, and burnout. Regarding ethically relevant outcomes, robotic and telecare technologies had the most reported findings. Most evidence concerned effects on the principles of beneficence/non-maleficence and respect for autonomy.
Digital nursing technologies' legitimacy hinges on their impact on patient outcomes and nurses' work, safety, and health. This review identifies a diverse array of these technologies, with both positive and negative effects. However, due to narrative limitations, meta-analysis was impractical. Future research should quantitatively assess the effects of various digital nursing technologies on work, safety, health, and ethical outcomes.
Research on digital tech in nursing lacks focus on key work factors, occupational health and ethical outcomes. #NursingTech #ResearchGaps.
数字技术有望减轻护士的工作量并提高护理质量。然而,鉴于迄今为止已发表的大量单项研究和综述研究,全面了解数字技术对护理的影响并有效利用现有证据具有挑战性。
本综述旨在(i)根据已发表的数字护理技术综述的目的和所研究的特定技术进行梳理,以综合关于这些技术的使用如何与(ii)护士的工作相关因素和组织因素、专业行为、健康与工作安全以及(iii)护理对象的伦理相关结果相关联的证据。
综述的预注册概述(PROSPERO编号:CRD42023389751)。
我们在八个数据库、五本关键期刊以及截至2024年5月21日以英文发表的纳入综述的参考文献列表中搜索系统综述。
我们使用AMSTAR 2清单评估报告与护理结果关联的纳入综述的方法学质量。对提取的数据按其频率进行分析并进行叙述性综合。
我们识别出213篇关于数字技术在护理领域应用的综述。其中大多数聚焦于信息通信技术。最常报告的研究目标包括技术使用和/或与之相关的一般体验以及对护理接受者的技术相关后果。关于工作相关和组织因素,发现对护理任务的执行、信息管理和工作控制有有益影响。根据技术类型,综述报告文档活动、沟通/协作存在混合效应,对护士工作量主要有负面影响。关于职业安全与健康相关以及其他护士相关结果,综述大多报告对护士工作满意度和专业能力有积极影响。存在与精神和身体压力相关的不良影响,如挫折感、疲劳和职业倦怠增加。关于伦理相关结果,机器人技术和远程护理技术报告的研究结果最多。大多数证据涉及对行善/不伤害原则和尊重自主权原则的影响。
数字护理技术的合理性取决于其对患者结果以及护士工作、安全和健康的影响。本综述识别出了一系列此类技术,既有积极影响也有消极影响。然而,由于叙述性限制,荟萃分析不切实际。未来研究应定量评估各种数字护理技术对工作、安全、健康和伦理结果的影响。
护理领域数字技术研究缺乏对关键工作因素、职业健康和伦理结果的关注。#护理技术#研究差距