Lenton Simon, Potter Gary, Fortin Davide, Granville Ashely, Grigg Jodie, Sevigny Eric, Wilkins Chris, Decorte Tom, Barratt Monica
National Drug Research Institute, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Australia.
Lancaster University Law School, UK.
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Nov 28;144(Pt 3):104662. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104662.
There is emerging recognition of the risks of harmful chemical pesticides, fertilizers and 'nutrients' by cannabis growers. One group of chemicals, Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs), many of which have been banned from food crops for decades, have been found unlisted in a number of fertilizers and supplements marketed at cannabis growers.
This paper predominately uses data from a 2020-21 convenience web survey of mainly small-scale, recent (last 5yrs) cannabis growers from 18 countries (n = 11,479). We describe their growing practices and use of chemicals and employ logistic regression to explore predictors of chemical use. We also compare chemical use in our 2020-21 sample with that from our 2012-13 data in the 3 countries (Australia, Denmark, UK) where respondents were asked about their use of growing chemicals in both surveys.
In 2020-21, 26 % of recent cannabis growers reported use of chemicals. Growers who were at highest odds of using chemicals were male, older, living in urban/cities, not growing for environmental reasons, growing in order to sell, growing where they believed cannabis was legal, and growing under artificial light in soil or non-soil media. We found significant reductions in the proportions of our samples who reported using chemical fertilizers in the 3 countries where we collected data in both waves.
Growers using soil and artificial light comprised over half of all the chemical users in the sample. Efforts at informing and educating growers about the problems of chemical fertilizer, nutrient and pesticide use should include all growers including those who grow in soil under artificial light. Possible explanations for the apparent decrease in chemical use from our 2012-13 to 2020-21 samples are discussed. Stricter regulation of the legal cannabis fertilizer market is required to empower growers to reduce the toxicity of cannabis they grow, distribute and consume.
大麻种植者对有害化学农药、化肥和“营养物质”的风险认识正在不断提高。一类化学物质,即植物生长调节剂(PGR),其中许多已被禁止用于粮食作物数十年,却在一些面向大麻种植者销售的肥料和补充剂中未列出。
本文主要使用了2020 - 21年对来自18个国家(n = 11479)的主要是小规模、近期(过去5年)大麻种植者进行的便利网络调查数据。我们描述了他们的种植方式和化学品使用情况,并采用逻辑回归来探索化学品使用的预测因素。我们还将2020 - 21年样本中的化学品使用情况与2012 - 13年数据中来自3个国家(澳大利亚、丹麦、英国)的情况进行了比较,这3个国家的受访者在两次调查中都被问及了他们对种植化学品的使用情况。
在2020 - 21年,26%的近期大麻种植者报告使用了化学品。使用化学品可能性最高的种植者为男性、年龄较大、居住在城市、并非出于环境原因种植、为销售而种植、在他们认为大麻合法的地方种植,以及在土壤或非土壤介质中人工光照下种植。我们发现在我们进行了两期数据收集的3个国家中,报告使用化肥的样本比例有显著下降。
使用土壤和人工光照的种植者占样本中所有化学品使用者的一半以上。在告知和教育种植者关于化肥、营养物质和农药使用问题方面所做的努力应涵盖所有种植者,包括那些在人工光照下土壤中种植的人。讨论了从2012 - 13年到2020 - 21年样本中化学品使用明显减少的可能原因。需要对合法的大麻肥料市场进行更严格的监管,以使种植者能够降低他们种植、分销和消费的大麻的毒性。