• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖化血红蛋白对行药物洗脱支架置入术患者血小板反应性及心血管结局的影响。

Impact of haemoglobinA1c on platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Jiading Branch of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 800 Huangjiahuayuan Road, Shanghai, 201803, People's Republic of China.

Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Jiading Branch of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 800 Huangjiahuayuan Road, Shanghai, 201803, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 29;14(1):29699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81537-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-81537-1
PMID:39613892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11607451/
Abstract

This study investigates the impact of hemoglobin A1c on platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. HbA1c levels were categorized into 3 groups: < 6.5%, 6.5-8.5%, and > 8.5%. ROC (resistance to clopidogrel) and ROA (resistance to aspirin) were calculated. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE, including all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and ischemia-driven revascularization. The secondary endpoints comprised individual MACE components. The incidence of ROC was 9.3% (151 of 1621), whereas that of ROA was 16.5% (268 of 1621). The ROC for each of the 3 groups significantly increased with increasing HbA1c levels [4.3% vs. 7.1% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.006]; however, the ROA did not [16.4% vs. 17.7% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.694]. HbA1c > 8.5 was significantly associated with ROC (3.356 [1.231, 9.234], p = 0.009). Compared with the HbA1c < 6.5 subgroup, the HbA1c˃8.5 subgroup was significantly associated with MACE (3.142 [2.346, 4.206], < 0.001), nonfatal MI (2.297 [1.275, 4.137], P = 0.006) and ischemia-driven revascularization (3.845 [2.082, 7.101], p < 0.001), but not all-cause mortality (2.371 [0.551, 10.190], 0.246) at the 36-month follow-up. HbA1c levels were positively correlated with ROC, but the adverse cardiovascular events were driven by elevated HbA1c, constituting an argument to intensify glycemic control in subjects with diabetes after intracoronary stent placement.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)对接受药物洗脱支架植入术的患者血小板反应性和心血管结局的影响。将 HbA1c 水平分为 3 组:<6.5%、6.5-8.5%和>8.5%。计算了抵抗氯吡格雷(ROA)和抵抗阿司匹林(ROC)的比值。主要终点是包括全因死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死和缺血驱动血运重建的复合终点不良事件(MACE)。次要终点包括每个 MACE 成分。ROC 的发生率为 9.3%(151/1621),而 ROA 的发生率为 16.5%(268/1621)。随着 HbA1c 水平的升高,每组的 ROC 均显著增加[4.3%、7.1%和 10.1%,p=0.006];然而,ROA 没有增加[16.4%、17.7%和 14.3%,P=0.694]。HbA1c>8.5 与 ROC 显著相关(3.356 [1.231, 9.234],p=0.009)。与 HbA1c<6.5 亚组相比,HbA1c˃8.5 亚组与 MACE(3.142 [2.346, 4.206],<0.001)、非致死性心肌梗死(2.297 [1.275, 4.137],P=0.006)和缺血驱动的血运重建(3.845 [2.082, 7.101],p<0.001)显著相关,但与全因死亡率(2.371 [0.551, 10.190],0.246)在 36 个月的随访中无显著相关性。HbA1c 水平与 ROC 呈正相关,但不良心血管事件是由 HbA1c 升高驱动的,这表明在冠状动脉内支架植入后,糖尿病患者应加强血糖控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/2a65a69a9012/41598_2024_81537_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/1e8c317a3a78/41598_2024_81537_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/ac4957ac2cb4/41598_2024_81537_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/86c22bbc13d8/41598_2024_81537_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/2a65a69a9012/41598_2024_81537_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/1e8c317a3a78/41598_2024_81537_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/ac4957ac2cb4/41598_2024_81537_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/86c22bbc13d8/41598_2024_81537_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44bc/11607451/2a65a69a9012/41598_2024_81537_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of haemoglobinA1c on platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.糖化血红蛋白对行药物洗脱支架置入术患者血小板反应性及心血管结局的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 29;14(1):29699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81537-1.
2
Impact of Hemoglobin A1c Levels on Residual Platelet Reactivity and Outcomes After Insertion of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents (from the ADAPT-DES Study).糖化血红蛋白水平对冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术后残余血小板反应性及预后的影响(来自ADAPT-DES研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.037. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
3
Impact of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Hyporesponsiveness in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents: 2-Year Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Registry Study.经药物洗脱支架治疗的患者阿司匹林和氯吡格雷低反应性的影响:一项前瞻性、多中心注册研究的 2 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 28;10(16):1607-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.059. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
High platelet reactivity affects the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.高血小板反应性会影响接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0394-0.
5
Safety and efficacy of policosanol in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after drug-eluting stent implantation: two-year follow-up results.聚多卡醇对药物洗脱支架植入术后高治疗中血小板反应性患者的安全性和有效性:两年随访结果
Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Oct;34(5):337-42. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12204.
6
Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study.药物洗脱支架冠状动脉植入后血小板反应性与临床结局(ADAPT-DES):一项前瞻性多中心登记研究。
Lancet. 2013 Aug 17;382(9892):614-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61170-8. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
7
Relationship between high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents implantation (PAINT-DES): a prospective, propensity score-matched cohort study.氯吡格雷治疗下高血小板反应性与药物洗脱支架植入术后长期临床结局的关系(PAINT-DES):一项前瞻性、倾向评分匹配队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 24;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0841-1.
8
Routine assessment of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and gene polymorphisms in predicting clinical outcome following drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with stable coronary artery disease.常规评估氯吡格雷抵抗血小板活性和基因多态性在预测药物洗脱支架植入术后稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的临床结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.010.
9
Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention extent, complexity and platelet reactivity on outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗程度、复杂性和血小板反应性对药物洗脱支架植入术后结局的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.103.
10
Platelet Reactivity and Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: From the ADAPT-DES Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后血小板反应性与缺血性卒中风险:ADAPT-DES 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1277-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.263. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Molecular genomic and epigenomic characteristics related to aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗相关的分子基因组和表观基因组特征。
BMC Med Genomics. 2024 Jun 20;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12920-024-01936-1.
2
Impact of Platelet Hyperreactivity and Diabetes Mellitus on Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A Single-Center Cohort Clinical Study.血小板高反应性和糖尿病对缺血性脑卒中复发的影响:一项单中心队列临床研究。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Mar 23;17:1127-1138. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S450059. eCollection 2024.
3
Implication of diabetic status on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation: results from the PTRG-DES consortium.
糖尿病状态对药物洗脱支架置入后血小板反应性和临床结局的影响:来自 PTRG-DES 联盟的结果。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Sep 7;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01976-4.
4
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Concise Review for Clinicians.双联抗血小板治疗:给临床医生的简明综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 18;13(7):1580. doi: 10.3390/life13071580.
5
Association of ADP-Induced Whole-Blood Platelet Aggregation with Serum Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease When Receiving Maintenance Ticagrelor-Based Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.接受基于替格瑞洛的维持性双联抗血小板治疗的冠心病患者中,ADP诱导的全血血小板聚集与血清低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的关联
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 6;12(13):4530. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134530.
6
Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients According to Average and Visit-to-Visit Variations of HbA1c Levels During the First 3 Years of Diabetes Diagnosis.根据糖尿病诊断后前 3 年期间平均和随访间 HbA1c 水平的变化,2 型糖尿病患者的心血管疾病长期风险。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jan 30;38(4):e24. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e24.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Ticagrelor, Prasugrel, and Clopidogrel for Secondary Prophylaxis in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.替格瑞洛、普拉格雷和氯吡格雷用于急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Feb;113(2):401-411. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2797. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
8
Relationship between CYP2C19 Polymorphism and Clopidogrel Resistance in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Ischemic Stroke in China.中国冠心病和缺血性脑卒中患者 CYP2C19 多态性与氯吡格雷抵抗的关系。
Genet Res (Camb). 2022 Oct 21;2022:1901256. doi: 10.1155/2022/1901256. eCollection 2022.
9
Glycaemic Control in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Is the Role for the Novel Antidiabetic Agents? .接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的血糖控制:新型抗糖尿病药物的作用是什么?
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 30;23(13):7261. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137261.
10
Poor glycemic control rather than types of diabetes is a risk factor for sarcopenia in diabetes mellitus: The MUSCLES-DM study.血糖控制不佳而非糖尿病类型是糖尿病患者发生肌少症的危险因素:MUSCLES-DM 研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Nov;13(11):1881-1888. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13882. Epub 2022 Jul 18.