Sui Yuwen, Ettema Dick, Helbich Marco
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584, CB, the Netherlands.
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584, CB, the Netherlands.
Environ Res. 2025 Jan 15;265:120481. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120481. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
Mental health status may be associated with residential neighborhoods' physical and social characteristics; however, longitudinal evidence is limited, and the findings are inconsistent.
To examine the longitudinal associations between neighborhood physical and social environments and mental health among adults after residential relocation.
We used national-representative panel data of 3000 adults between 2008 and 2013 in the Netherlands. We included movers relocating to neighborhood environments identified as health-supportive or adverse; non-movers served as the control group. Mental health was measured pre- and post-move using the Mental Health Inventory. Time-varying exposure to physical environmental factors (i.e., green space, blue space, air pollution, and population density) and social environmental factors (i.e., socioeconomic deprivation and social fragmentation) were assigned based on adults' residential neighborhood histories. We used propensity score matching to select non-movers from the control group and difference-in-difference regressions to estimate the associations between environmental changes and mental health.
Our results showed that decreases in fine particulate matter (β = -3.869, 95% CI: [-7.583, -0.155]), population density (β = -5.893, 95% CI: [-9.468, -2.319]), and socioeconomic deprivation (β = -4.756, 95% CI: [-7.800, -1.712]) were significantly associated with improvements in mental health. An increase in neighborhood social fragmentation was significantly associated with improvements in mental health (β = -3.520, 95% CI: [-6.742, -0.298]). We observed null associations between changes in mental health due to changes in green and blue space.
Following relocation, changed neighborhood environmental conditions appear to have longitudinal mental health associations. Moving to a neighborhood with less air pollution, lower population density, and reduced socioeconomic deprivation was mental health-supportively associated. However, the finding that greater social fragmentation contributes to mental health improvements requires further investigation.
心理健康状况可能与居住社区的物理和社会特征相关;然而,纵向证据有限,且研究结果不一致。
研究成年人迁居后社区物理和社会环境与心理健康之间的纵向关联。
我们使用了2008年至2013年荷兰3000名成年人的全国代表性面板数据。我们纳入了迁至被确定为健康支持型或不利型社区环境的迁居者;未迁居者作为对照组。在迁居前后使用心理健康量表测量心理健康状况。根据成年人的居住社区历史,确定其随时间变化接触的物理环境因素(即绿地、蓝地、空气污染和人口密度)和社会环境因素(即社会经济剥夺和社会碎片化)。我们使用倾向得分匹配从对照组中选择未迁居者,并使用双重差分回归来估计环境变化与心理健康之间的关联。
我们的结果表明,细颗粒物减少(β = -3.869,95%置信区间:[-7.583,-0.155])、人口密度降低(β = -5.893,95%置信区间:[-9.468,-2.319])和社会经济剥夺减轻(β = -4.756,95%置信区间:[-7.800,-1.712])与心理健康改善显著相关。社区社会碎片化增加与心理健康改善显著相关(β = -3.520,95%置信区间:[-6.742,-0.298])。我们观察到绿地和蓝地变化与心理健康变化之间无关联。
迁居后,社区环境条件的变化似乎与心理健康存在纵向关联。搬到空气污染较少、人口密度较低且社会经济剥夺减轻的社区对心理健康有支持作用。然而,社会碎片化程度越高有助于改善心理健康这一发现需要进一步研究。