Suppr超能文献

与5Y-TZP氧化锆相比,压制硅酸锂陶瓷在不同加载方案下的疲劳行为和可靠性。

Fatigue behavior and reliability of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics compared to 5Y-TZP zirconia under different loading protocols.

作者信息

Buser Ramona, Dönmez Mustafa Borga, Hoffmann Moritz, Hampe Rüdiger, Stawarczyk Bogna

机构信息

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2025 Feb;41(2):134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Nov 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the fatigue behavior and reliability of 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics and a 5 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (5Y-TZP) when 3 dynamic loading protocols were used.

METHODS

Bar-shaped specimens (30 × 4 × 3 mm) were fabricated from 5 pressed lithium disilicate ceramics (AMB, CEL, INI, IPS, and LIV) and a 5Y-TZP (ZR) (N = 324). Six specimens from each material were subjected to a static 4-point fracture load test, while the remaining specimens were subjected dynamic loading by increasing the starting load (30 % of the static fracture load) in every 5000 cycles by 50 N (loading protocol 1), in every 5000 cycles by 5 % (loading protocol 2) or in every 1000 cycles by 10 N (loading protocol 3) until fracture (n = 16). The fracture load, flexural strength, and number of cycles until failure were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Scheffé tests. The survival rate was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and further compared with Mantel-Cox test, while the correlation between the fracture load and flexural strength was analyzed with Pearson's correlation test (α = 0.05). Fractographic analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The interaction between the materials and the loading protocol affected the number of cycles until failure, while the material type affected fracture load and flexural strength values (P < 0.001). ZR had the highest and LIV mostly had lower fracture load and flexural strength (P ≤ 0.034). A positive correlation was found between the fracture load and flexural strength (r = 0.997, P < 0.001). For lithium disilicate ceramics, loading protocol 2 and for ZR, loading protocols 1 and 3 led to the highest number of cycles and survival rate (P ≤ 0.041). Regardless of the loading protocol, all lithium disilicate ceramics had a similar fragmentation pattern with single compression curls and 2-piece fractures were observed.

SIGNIFICANCE

Tested materials are suitable for adhesively luted monolithic single-unit prosthesis as they had mean flexural strength values higher than 100 MPa. Measuring the fracture load with loading protocol 3 can be considered time-efficient to evaluate the fatigue behavior of pressed lithium disilicate ceramics.

摘要

目的

比较5种压制二硅酸锂陶瓷和一种5摩尔%氧化钇稳定氧化锆(5Y-TZP)在使用3种动态加载方案时的疲劳行为和可靠性。

方法

从5种压制二硅酸锂陶瓷(AMB、CEL、INI、IPS和LIV)和一种5Y-TZP(ZR)制备条形试样(30×4×3mm)(N = 324)。每种材料的6个试样进行静态四点断裂载荷试验,其余试样通过在每5000次循环中将起始载荷(静态断裂载荷的30%)增加50N(加载方案1)、在每5000次循环中增加5%(加载方案2)或在每1000次循环中增加10N(加载方案3)进行动态加载,直至断裂(n = 16)。采用双向方差分析和Scheffé检验分析断裂载荷、弯曲强度和直至失效的循环次数。用Kaplan-Meier分析评估存活率,并通过Mantel-Cox检验进一步比较,同时用Pearson相关检验分析断裂载荷与弯曲强度之间的相关性(α = 0.05)。还进行了断口分析。

结果

材料与加载方案之间的相互作用影响直至失效的循环次数,而材料类型影响断裂载荷和弯曲强度值(P < 0.001)。ZR的断裂载荷和弯曲强度最高,LIV大多较低(P≤0.034)。发现断裂载荷与弯曲强度之间存在正相关(r = 0.997,P < 0.001)。对于二硅酸锂陶瓷,加载方案2以及对于ZR,加载方案1和3导致最高的循环次数和存活率(P≤0.041)。无论加载方案如何,所有二硅酸锂陶瓷都有相似的破碎模式,观察到单个压缩卷曲和两件式断裂。

意义

测试材料适用于粘结固定的整体单单位假体,因为它们的平均弯曲强度值高于100MPa。用加载方案3测量断裂载荷可被认为是评估压制二硅酸锂陶瓷疲劳行为的省时方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验