Garg Neha, Lewis Kamryn, White Perrin C, Adhikari Soumya
Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Feb 1;48(2):259-264. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1562.
The adoption of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in inpatient settings in the pediatric population has been slow because of a scarcity of data on their reliability in hospitalized children.
We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of the Dexcom G6 CGM system in pediatric patients with diabetes admitted to our academic children's hospital from March 2018 to September 2023. We cross-referenced the Dexcom Clarity database against an internal database of inpatient admissions to identify all children with CGM data admitted to the hospital. We recorded sensor glucose readings from Clarity and values for point-of-care (POC) glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and pH from the electronic medical record. CGM accuracy and clinical reliability were measured by mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and Clarke error grid (CEG) analyses.
There were 3,200 admissions of children with diabetes in this period, of which 277 (from 202 patients age 2-18 years) had associated CGM data. Paired CGM and POC measurements (n = 2,904) were compared, resulting in an MARD of 15.9%, with 96.6% of the values in zones A and B of the CEG analysis. Approximately 62% of paired values fell within a 15% or 15 mg/dL difference, whichever was larger (15%/15 mg/dL range), 74% within 20%/20, and 88% within 30%/30. Serum pH, sodium, and BUN had no impact on CGM values or absolute relative difference in linear regression analysis.
CGMs demonstrated acceptable accuracy in hospitalized children with diabetes. CGM data should be integrated into hospital electronic records to optimize management.
由于缺乏住院儿童中连续血糖监测仪(CGM)可靠性的数据,儿科住院患者中CGM的采用速度一直较慢。
我们回顾性分析了2018年3月至2023年9月入住我院学术儿童医院的糖尿病儿科患者中德康G6 CGM系统的准确性。我们将德康Clarity数据库与住院患者内部数据库进行交叉比对,以识别所有有CGM数据的住院儿童。我们记录了Clarity中的传感器血糖读数以及电子病历中即时检测(POC)血糖、血尿素氮(BUN)和pH值。通过平均绝对相对差异(MARD)和克拉克误差网格(CEG)分析来衡量CGM的准确性和临床可靠性。
在此期间,有3200例糖尿病儿童入院,其中277例(来自202名2至18岁的患者)有相关的CGM数据。对配对的CGM和POC测量值(n = 2904)进行了比较,得出MARD为15.9%,在CEG分析的A区和B区中有96.6%的值。大约62%的配对值落在15%或15mg/dL差异范围内(以较大者为准,即15%/15mg/dL范围),74%在20%/20范围内,88%在30%/30范围内。血清pH值、钠和BUN在线性回归分析中对CGM值或绝对相对差异没有影响。
CGM在住院糖尿病儿童中显示出可接受的准确性。CGM数据应整合到医院电子记录中以优化管理。