Suppr超能文献

既往有中度至重度血小板减少症的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者接受PSMA放射性配体治疗的安全性。

Safety of PSMA radioligand therapy in mCRPC patients with preexisting moderate to severe thrombocytopenia.

作者信息

Bastian Moritz B, Sieben Maike, Blickle Arne, Burgard Caroline, Speicher Tilman, Bartholomä Mark, Schaefer-Schuler Andrea, Maus Stephan, Ezziddin Samer, Rosar Florian

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 50, 66421, Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Mar;52(4):1271-1277. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-07006-z. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to analyze the safety of prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with preexisting moderate to severe thrombocytopenia (CTCAE ≥ 2).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen mCRPC patients with preexisting thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 75 × 10/L) were included in this study. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of [Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (range 1-6). The course of platelet cell count was closely monitored within and after the PSMA-RLT and analyzed statistically and according to CTCAE.

RESULTS

No significant difference in platelet counts was observed between baseline and follow-up after each PSMA-RLT cycle: first cycle (54.18 ± 16.07 at baseline vs. 59.65 ± 39.16 at follow up [in × 10/L], p=  0.834), second cycle (58.56 ± 16.43 vs. 107.1 ± 56.44, p = 0.203), and third cycle (60.38 ± 16.57 vs. 132.1 ± 80.43, p = 0.148), respectively. Similarly, baseline and end of treatment values, irrespective of the number of administered cycles, did not reveal a significant difference (54.18 ± 16.07 vs. 72.06 ± 71.9, p = 0.741). After the end of therapy, irrespective of the number of administered cycles, 29.4% of patients remained stable in terms of CTCAE scoring, 41.2% changed to a higher score and 29.4% improved to a lower score. We observed no critical bleeding events due to thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

Despite the common consideration of marked preexisting thrombocytopenia as a contraindication for RLT, this study indicates feasibility of PSMA-RLT in patients with preexisting thrombocytopenia of grade ≥ 2, as in our preliminary experience, there was no RLT-induced significant deterioration of platelet cell count. Thus, patients with thrombocytopenia should not be categorically excluded from receiving PSMA-RLT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析前列腺特异性膜抗原放射性配体疗法(PSMA-RLT)在已有中度至重度血小板减少症(CTCAE≥2级)的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中的安全性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了17例已有血小板减少症(血小板计数<75×10⁹/L)的mCRPC患者。患者接受了中位数为3个周期的[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617治疗(范围为1-6个周期)。在PSMA-RLT治疗期间及之后密切监测血小板细胞计数的变化过程,并根据CTCAE进行统计学分析。

结果

在每个PSMA-RLT周期后的基线和随访之间,血小板计数未观察到显著差异:第一个周期(基线时54.18±16.07 vs.随访时59.65±39.16[×10⁹/L],p = 0.834),第二个周期(58.56±16.43 vs. 107.1±56.44,p = 0.203),以及第三个周期(60.38±16.57 vs. 132.1±80.43,p = 0.148)。同样,无论给药周期数如何,基线和治疗结束时的值均未显示出显著差异(54.18±16.07 vs. 72.06±71.9,p = 0.741)。治疗结束后,无论给药周期数如何,29.4%的患者在CTCAE评分方面保持稳定,41.2%的患者评分升高,29.4%的患者评分降低。我们未观察到因血小板减少症导致的严重出血事件。

结论

尽管通常将明显的既往血小板减少症视为RLT的禁忌证,但本研究表明,对于已有≥2级血小板减少症的患者,PSMA-RLT是可行的,因为根据我们的初步经验,没有RLT引起血小板细胞计数的显著恶化。因此,不应绝对排除血小板减少症患者接受PSMA-RLT治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d8/11839894/6effa6e355d4/259_2024_7006_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验