Weeks Joanna K, Pantel Austin R, Gitto Sarah B, Liu Fang, Schubert Erin K, Pryma Daniel A, Farwell Michael D, Mankoff David A, Mach Robert H, Simpkins Fiona, Lin Lilie L
Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Division of Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Therapy, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Nucl Med. 2025 Jan 3;66(1):34-39. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267627.
Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitors have improved ovarian cancer treatment outcomes. However, clinical response remains heterogeneous. Existing biomarkers, mainly breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (), are suboptimal. New tools are needed to guide patient selection. In this study, [F]fluorthanatrace ([F]FTT), a PET radiotracer for imaging PARP1, was compared with [F]FDG and tumor features commonly assessed in ovarian cancer. Subjects with epithelial ovarian cancer underwent both [F]FTT and [F]FDG PET before new oncologic treatment. The SUV of [F]FTT and [F]FDG was compared between lesions. [F]FTT SUV was compared with tumor location, tumor grade, and germline or somatic status. Linear mixed models were fitted to identify subject-level differences. Fifty-five lesions were identified in 14 subjects. No correlation was found between [F]FTT SUV and [F]FDG SUV per lesion, supporting distinct molecular targets. [F]FTT uptake varied widely across lesions, with no significant differences between mean SUV and tumor location, grade, or status. Our findings suggest that [F]FTT PET may provide unique information on ovarian cancer distinct from [F]FDG PET and commonly assessed tumor features. Our results imply a wide range of PARP1 expression in the studied ovarian tumors not explained by [F]FDG PET, location, grade, or mutational status.
聚(腺苷二磷酸核糖)聚合酶-1(PARP1)抑制剂改善了卵巢癌的治疗效果。然而,临床反应仍然存在异质性。现有的生物标志物,主要是乳腺癌易感基因1和2(),并不理想。需要新的工具来指导患者选择。在本研究中,将用于成像PARP1的正电子发射断层显像(PET)放射性示踪剂[F]氟那他曲([F]FTT)与[F]氟代脱氧葡萄糖([F]FDG)以及卵巢癌中通常评估的肿瘤特征进行了比较。上皮性卵巢癌患者在接受新的肿瘤治疗前接受了[F]FTT和[F]FDG PET检查。比较了病变之间[F]FTT和[F]FDG的标准化摄取值(SUV)。将[F]FTT SUV与肿瘤位置、肿瘤分级以及种系或体细胞状态进行了比较。采用线性混合模型来识别个体水平的差异。在14名受试者中识别出55个病变。每个病变的[F]FTT SUV与[F]FDG SUV之间未发现相关性,支持不同的分子靶点。[F]FTT摄取在不同病变之间差异很大,平均SUV与肿瘤位置、分级或状态之间无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,[F]FTT PET可能提供与[F]FDG PET以及通常评估的肿瘤特征不同的关于卵巢癌的独特信息。我们的结果表明,在所研究的卵巢肿瘤中,PARP1表达范围广泛,无法用[F]FDG PET、位置、分级或突变状态来解释。