Parallel Wire Approach for Recanalisation of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions in a Large Contemporary Multi-Center Registry.

BACKGROUND

The parallel wire technique (PW) is a classic part of the antegrade strategy to open chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO).

AIMS

With modern wires and dual-lumen catheters (DLC) the approach has evolved, but this progress had not been evaluated in a contemporary registry of CTO interventions.

METHOD

This analysis is based on 26,589 CTO procedures performed by 36 operators with > 50 procedures annually between 2015 and 2022. The different strategies and techniques were analyzed with respect to clinical and lesion characteristics, procedural resource use and periprocedural complications. Within the antegrade approach, PW was compared to antegrade wire escalation (AWE) and antegrade-dissection re-entry (ADR).

RESULTS

The primary antegrade approach was used in 65.9%, primary retrograde in 16.9% and a strategy change in 17.2% with a wide inter-operator variability. In primary antegrade approach, PW was applied in 10.8% and ADR in 5.3%. Lesion complexity was higher in AWE and PW than with single wire, and highest in ADR procedures, leading to more complex procedures with higher contrast and radiation usage. Complications increased with ADR, while they were similar with PW and AWE. Through the observation period PW adoption increased steadily from 6.7% to 10.7%, as the DLC use facilitating PW increased from 8.3% to 17.0% over the observation period.

CONCLUSION

In this largest database of contemporary CTO PCI from Europe, PW adoption increased over time but remained low at about 10%. While there was a wide individual variety among the operators, it was a safe and successful technique.