Powles Thomas, Csőszi Tibor, Loriot Yohann, Matsubara Nobuaki, Geczi Lajos, Cheng Susanna Y-S, Fradet Yves, Alva Ajjai, Oudard Stéphane, Vulsteke Christof, Morales-Barrera Rafael, Fléchon Aude, Gunduz Seyda, Liu Chih-Chin, Moreno Blanca Homet, Bavle Abhishek, Özgüroğlu Mustafa
Barts Cancer Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust Biomedical Research Center, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
County Oncology Centre, Hetényi Géza Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Feb;23(1):102261. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102261. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
KEYNOTE-361 evaluated first-line pembrolizumab with and without platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The primary end points of progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were not met. Exploratory analysis of efficacy by platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) is reported.
Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles with or without chemotherapy (gemcitabine with investigator's choice of either cisplatin or carboplatin) or chemotherapy alone. This exploratory subset analysis evaluated PFS and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy with versus without pembrolizumab for patients assigned to chemotherapy-containing arms of KEYNOTE-361.
Of 1010 patients enrolled, 703 were assigned to receive a chemotherapy-containing regimen (n = 312 cisplatin based; n = 391 carboplatin based). Median follow-up was 31.3 months. For cisplatin-based arms, with versus without pembrolizumab, median OS was 20.1 versus 16.4 months (HR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.67-1.15) and median PFS was 8.5 versus 7.1 months (HR 0.67, 0.51-0.89). ORR was 64.1% versus 48.7%, respectively. For carboplatin-based arms, with versus without pembrolizumab, median OS was 15.5 versus 12.3 months (HR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.67-1.06) and median PFS was 8.0 versus 6.7 months (HR 0.86, 0.68-1.09). ORR was 47.2% versus 41.8%, respectively. Among patients in the cisplatin-based versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy alone arms, 55.8% versus 41.8% received a subsequent antiprogrammed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 therapy. The addition of pembrolizumab did not significantly increase the incidence of adverse events reported.
Results suggest trends toward OS and PFS improvements with the addition of pembrolizumab to gemcitabine-platinum doublet over gemcitabine-platinum alone regardless of whether cisplatin or carboplatin was the chosen platinum agent. OS may have been influenced by active subsequent therapies.
KEYNOTE-361研究评估了一线帕博利珠单抗联合或不联合铂类化疗与单纯化疗相比,用于晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的疗效。无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)的主要终点未达到。本文报告了按铂类药物(顺铂或卡铂)进行疗效的探索性分析。
符合条件的患者按1:1:1随机分配,接受每3周静脉注射200mg帕博利珠单抗,共≤35个周期,联合或不联合化疗(吉西他滨加研究者选择的顺铂或卡铂)或单纯化疗。这项探索性子集分析通过盲法独立中央审查评估了根据RECIST v1.1标准的PFS和客观缓解率(ORR),以及KEYNOTE-361研究中接受含化疗方案治疗的患者,使用顺铂或卡铂为基础的化疗联合或不联合帕博利珠单抗的OS。
在入组的1010例患者中,703例被分配接受含化疗方案(n = 312例基于顺铂;n = 391例基于卡铂)。中位随访时间为31.3个月。对于基于顺铂的治疗组,联合与不联合帕博利珠单抗相比,中位OS分别为20.1个月和16.4个月(HR 0.88,95%CI,0.67 - 1.15),中位PFS分别为8.5个月和7.1个月(HR 0.67,0.51 - 0.89)。ORR分别为64.1%和48.7%。对于基于卡铂的治疗组,联合与不联合帕博利珠单抗相比,中位OS分别为15.5个月和12.3个月(HR 0.84,95%CI,0.67 - 1.06),中位PFS分别为8.0个月和6.7个月(HR 0.86,0.68 - 1.09)。ORR分别为47.2%和41.8%。在单纯基于顺铂与基于卡铂的化疗组患者中,分别有55.8%和41.8%接受了后续的抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/配体1治疗。添加帕博利珠单抗并未显著增加报告的不良事件发生率。
结果表明,无论选择顺铂还是卡铂作为铂类药物,在吉西他滨 - 铂双联方案中添加帕博利珠单抗与单纯吉西他滨 - 铂方案相比,有改善OS和PFS的趋势。OS可能受到后续积极治疗的影响。