Prognostic impact of intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention according to atherothrombotic risk: a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Recent randomized controlled trials support the use of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to improve patient prognosis. However, the subsequent risk of clinical events in patients with coronary artery disease is not determined solely by lesion characteristics or how these lesions are treated. The current study investigated whether the effects of intravascular imaging in complex PCI vary according to atherothrombotic risks.

METHODS

This study was a post hoc analysis of the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial, which compared intravascular imaging-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in patients with complex coronary artery lesions. The study population was stratified by atherothrombotic risk, assessed using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score for secondary prevention (TRS-2P). TRS-2P is calculated based on the presence of the following factors: age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, peripheral arterial disease, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, and renal dysfunction. Patients were categorized into low-risk (TRS-2P <3) or high-risk (TRS-2P ≥ 3) groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Among the total study population, 1247 patients were categorized as low-risk, and 392 as high-risk. The risk of target vessel failure was significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (15.5% vs 7.2%; HR, 2.13; 95%CI, 1.51-3.00; P <.001). The benefits of intravascular imaging-guided PCI over angiography-guided PCI did not differ between the low-risk group (5.6% vs 10.4%; HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.36-0.86) and the high-risk group (14.1% vs 18.5%; HR, 0.71; 95%CI, 0.41-1.24), with no significant interaction (interaction P=.496).

CONCLUSIONS

In this hypothesis-generating post hoc analysis of the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial, patients with high atherothrombotic risk had significantly worse clinical outcomes than those with low atherothrombotic risk. Nevertheless, the prognostic impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI was similarly observed in both low- and high-risk groups. RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI clinical trial register number: NCT03381872.