Chen Qiuhong, Li Yonglin, Lin Yiyang, Lin Xiujing, Arbing Rachel, Chen Wei-Ti, Huang Feifei
School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 6;24(1):1505. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13246-x.
Non-pharmacological interventions, as complements to pharmacological treatments, are widely employed for managing symptom clusters in patients with lung cancer. Although numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have explored the effects of these interventions, most studies have centred on the broader cancer population and specific symptom clusters. This review aims to consolidate existing non-pharmacological interventions and assess their effectiveness in managing symptom clusters among lung cancer patients.
A comprehensive literature search, encompassing eight databases from inception to October 1, 2024, was conducted. Two independent reviewers carried out the study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions. The findings were synthesized narratively based on intervention type and supplemented by meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023467406).
This systematic review comprised 15 relevant studies involving 1,692 patients, published between 2011 and 2024. The analysis revealed the effectiveness of psychological, educational, and complementary or alternative medicine interventions in alleviating the severity of most symptom clusters. However, the efficacy of exercise-based and multimodal interventions remained inconclusive. The meta-analysis demonstrated a positive impact of non-pharmacological interventions on depression compared with the control conditions (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI [-0.46, -0.15], p < 0.01, I = 6%). Additionally, the educational intervention subgroup showed low heterogeneity and effectively improved fatigue (SMD = -0.50, 95% CI [-0.68, -0.33], p < 0.01, I = 0%).
Psychological and educational interventions have proven effective in managing symptom clusters in lung cancer patients. However, further research is needed to explore the effects of exercise, multimodal approaches, and complementary or alternative medicine. To enhance symptom management, future research could focus on core symptom clusters.
作为药物治疗的补充,非药物干预广泛应用于肺癌患者症状群的管理。尽管众多系统评价和荟萃分析探讨了这些干预措施的效果,但大多数研究集中于更广泛的癌症人群和特定症状群。本综述旨在整合现有的非药物干预措施,并评估其在管理肺癌患者症状群方面的有效性。
进行了全面的文献检索,涵盖从数据库建立至2024年10月1日的8个数据库。两名独立评审员进行研究筛选、质量评估和数据提取。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具和干预非随机研究中的偏倚风险评估方法学质量。研究结果根据干预类型进行叙述性综合,并使用RevMan 5.4软件进行荟萃分析补充。研究方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42023467406)注册。
本系统评价纳入了15项相关研究,涉及1692例患者,发表时间为2011年至2024年。分析显示心理、教育以及补充或替代医学干预在减轻大多数症状群的严重程度方面有效。然而,基于运动的干预和多模式干预的疗效仍不明确。荟萃分析表明,与对照条件相比,非药物干预对抑郁有积极影响(标准化均数差= -0.30,95%可信区间[-0.46, -0.15],p < 0.01,I² = 6%)。此外,教育干预亚组异质性低,有效改善了疲劳(标准化均数差= -0.50,95%可信区间[-0.68, -0.33],p < 0.01,I² = 0%)。
心理和教育干预已被证明在管理肺癌患者症状群方面有效。然而,需要进一步研究以探索运动、多模式方法以及补充或替代医学的效果。为加强症状管理,未来研究可聚焦于核心症状群。