Tausch Eugen, Schneider Christof, Stilgenbauer Stephan
Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm and Division of CLL-Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Germany.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):457-466. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000656.
The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been transformed over the past decade based on a better understanding of disease biology, especially regarding molecular genetic drivers and relevant signaling pathways. Agents focusing on B-cell receptor (in particular Bruton tyrosine kinase [BTK]) and apoptosis (BCL2) targets have replaced chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as the treatment standard. BTK and BCL2 inhibitor-based therapy has consistently shown prolonged progression-free survival and in some instances even increased overall survival against CIT in frontline phase 3 trials. This improvement is particularly pronounced in high-risk CLL subgroups defined by unmutated IGHV, deletion 17p (17p-), and/or the mutation of TP53, making CIT in these subgroups essentially obsolete. Despite remarkable advances, these markers also retain a differential prognostic and predictive impact in the context of targeted therapies, mandating risk-stratification in frontline management. Furthermore, BTK- and BCL2-targeting agents differ in their adverse event profiles, requiring adjustment of treatment choice based on patient characteristics such as coexisting conditions, comedications, and delivery-of-care aspects.
在过去十年中,基于对疾病生物学的更深入理解,尤其是关于分子遗传驱动因素和相关信号通路的理解,慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的治疗发生了变革。专注于B细胞受体(特别是布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶[BTK])和细胞凋亡(BCL2)靶点的药物已取代化疗免疫疗法(CIT)成为治疗标准。在一线3期试验中,基于BTK和BCL2抑制剂的疗法一直显示出无进展生存期延长,在某些情况下甚至相对于CIT提高了总生存期。这种改善在由未突变的IGHV、17号染色体短臂缺失(17p-)和/或TP53突变定义的高危CLL亚组中尤为明显,使得这些亚组中的CIT基本上过时。尽管取得了显著进展,但这些标志物在靶向治疗背景下也保留了不同的预后和预测影响,因此在一线治疗管理中需要进行风险分层。此外,靶向BTK和BCL2的药物在不良事件谱方面存在差异,需要根据患者特征(如并存疾病、合并用药和护理提供方面)调整治疗选择。