Shi Qingmiao, Xue Chen, Zeng Yifan, Chu Qingfei, Jiang Shuwen, Zhang Yaqi, Yuan Xin, Zhu Danhua, Li Lanjuan
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2025 Jan;287:138510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138510. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
Inflammatory response plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of cholestatic liver injury. PPARα agonists have been shown to regulate bile acid homeostasis and hepatic inflammation. However, the immunoregulatory mechanisms through which PPARα agonists ameliorate cholestatic liver injury remain unclear. In this study, surgical bile duct ligation was performed to establish a mouse model of cholestasis. Our study revealed that PPARα agonist alleviated cholestatic liver injury in mice by suppressing inflammatory response, reducing neutrophil infiltration, and promoting M2-like macrophage polarization. CyTOF analysis showed that PPARα agonist increased the proportion of anti-inflammatory F4/80CD44MHCII M2-like macrophages while decreasing the proportion of pro-inflammatory CD64CX3CR1CCR2VISTACD172aCD44 M1-like MoMFs. Additionally, scRNA-seq indicated that PPARα agonist regulated the developmental trajectory and homeostasis of hepatic macrophages. Mechanistically, PPARα agonist may influence the expression of immune regulators in heterogeneous macrophages to exert protective effects against cholestasis. In addition, the CCL and MIF signaling pathways may participate in the communication among hepatic immune cells, including macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells, in response to the PPARα agonist. In conclusions, PPARα agonist alleviated cholestatic liver injury by attenuating the inflammatory response and restoring hepatic macrophage homeostasis. This study might enhance the understanding of the immunoregulatory mechanisms of PPARα agonists, providing promising therapeutic targets for cholestatic liver diseases.
炎症反应在胆汁淤积性肝损伤的发病机制中起重要作用。PPARα激动剂已被证明可调节胆汁酸稳态和肝脏炎症。然而,PPARα激动剂改善胆汁淤积性肝损伤的免疫调节机制仍不清楚。在本研究中,通过手术胆管结扎建立了胆汁淤积小鼠模型。我们的研究表明,PPARα激动剂通过抑制炎症反应、减少中性粒细胞浸润和促进M2样巨噬细胞极化来减轻小鼠胆汁淤积性肝损伤。CyTOF分析表明,PPARα激动剂增加了抗炎性F4/80CD44MHCII M2样巨噬细胞的比例,同时降低了促炎性CD64CX3CR1CCR2VISTACD172aCD44 M1样单核细胞来源的巨噬细胞的比例。此外,单细胞RNA测序表明,PPARα激动剂调节肝脏巨噬细胞的发育轨迹和稳态。机制上,PPARα激动剂可能影响异质性巨噬细胞中免疫调节因子的表达,从而对胆汁淤积发挥保护作用。此外,CCL和MIF信号通路可能参与肝脏免疫细胞(包括巨噬细胞、中性粒细胞、自然杀伤细胞和树突状细胞)之间对PPARα激动剂的应答通信。总之,PPARα激动剂通过减轻炎症反应和恢复肝脏巨噬细胞稳态来减轻胆汁淤积性肝损伤。本研究可能会增进对PPARα激动剂免疫调节机制的理解,为胆汁淤积性肝病提供有前景的治疗靶点。