Sadeghi Hasti, Ahmadi Fatemeh, McArthur Eric, Sontrop Jessica M, Abdullah Sheikh S, Urquhart Brad L, Kim Richard B, Muanda Flory T
Department of Biology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;91(4):1263-1271. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16365. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of death in older adults co-prescribed low-dose methotrexate and TMP-SMX vs. low-dose methotrexate and a cephalosporin.
We conducted a retrospective, population-based, new-user cohort study in Ontario, Canada (April 1, 2002-August 1, 2022) using linked administrative healthcare data. Older adults taking low-dose methotrexate who were newly co-prescribed TMP-SMX (n = 1602) were matched 1:1 with those who were newly co-prescribed a cephalosporin. The primary outcome was death within 30 days of the antibiotic dispensing date. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, a hospital visit with myelosuppression and a hospitalization with persistent infection defined as the main diagnosis. Propensity score matching was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression.
In a propensity-score matched cohort of 3204 adults taking low-dose methotrexate, the 30-day risk of death was similar in adults co-prescribed TMP-SMX vs. a cephalosporin (14/1602 [0.87%] vs. 15/1602 [0.94%]; RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.45-1.93]). The risk of all-cause hospitalization (RR 1.49 [95% CI 1.13-1.97]) and infection (RR 2.78 [95% CI 1.30-5.95]) was higher in adults treated with TMP-SMX than those treated with cephalosporins.
In older adults taking low-dose methotrexate, co-prescription of TMP-SMX vs. a cephalosporin was not associated with a higher 30-day risk of death but was associated with a higher 30-day risk of all-cause hospitalization and hospital admission with persistent infection. If verified, these risks should be balanced against the benefits of co-prescribing TMP-SMX and low-dose methotrexate.
本研究旨在描述同时开具低剂量甲氨蝶呤和复方新诺明与同时开具低剂量甲氨蝶呤和头孢菌素的老年人的死亡风险特征。
我们在加拿大安大略省(2002年4月1日至2022年8月1日)进行了一项基于人群的回顾性新用户队列研究,使用了关联的行政医疗保健数据。将新同时开具复方新诺明的低剂量甲氨蝶呤使用者(n = 1602)与新同时开具头孢菌素的使用者按1:1进行匹配。主要结局是抗生素配药日期后30天内的死亡。次要结局包括全因住院、因骨髓抑制的医院就诊以及以持续性感染为主要诊断的住院。倾向评分匹配用于在基线健康指标上平衡比较组。风险比(RR)通过改良泊松回归获得。
在3204名服用低剂量甲氨蝶呤的倾向评分匹配队列成年人中,同时开具复方新诺明与同时开具头孢菌素的成年人30天死亡风险相似(14/1602 [0.87%] 对 15/1602 [0.94%];RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.45 - 1.93])。与接受头孢菌素治疗的成年人相比,接受复方新诺明治疗的成年人全因住院风险(RR 1.49 [95% CI 1.13 - 1.97])和感染风险(RR 2.78 [95% CI 1.30 - 5.95])更高。
在服用低剂量甲氨蝶呤的老年人中,同时开具复方新诺明与同时开具头孢菌素相比,30天死亡风险并未更高,但全因住院和因持续性感染住院的30天风险更高。如果得到验证,这些风险应与同时开具复方新诺明和低剂量甲氨蝶呤的益处相权衡。