Kim Chul-Ho, Lee Dong-Hoon, Lee Jae-Sung, Jung Hyoung-Seok
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong-si, Republic of Korea.
J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Mar;50(3):282-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.018. Epub 2024 Dec 7.
Arthrodesis and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) are commonly performed procedures for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Although LRTI is the most common surgical treatment, CMC arthrodesis has been performed because of its reported advantages. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the differences between CMC arthrodesis and LRTI to better inform surgeons and patients when they are making treatment decisions.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to 27 August 2023 that directly compared arthrodesis with LRTI for thumb CMC joint arthritis. The pooled analysis compared the visual analog scale; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; grip strength; key pinch strength; reoperation rates; and postoperative complication rates.
Six studies describing 285 thumbs, including 141 and 155 thumbs that underwent arthrodesis and LRTI, respectively, were included. Visual analog scale (standard mean difference [SMD], -0.05; 95% CI, -0.40 to 0.30; P = .78), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, -1.12 to 2.17; P = .53), and grip strength (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.85 to 0.51; P = .27) showed no difference between the two groups. The arthrodesis group showed significantly higher key pinch strength (SMD, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90), reoperation rate (odds ratio, 8.02; 95% CI, 2.00-32.16), and postoperative complication rate (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.11-3.91; I = 0%) compared with the LRTI group.
Carpometacarpal arthrodesis is associated with a better key pinch strength than LRTI. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in functional scores and grip strength. Patients who undergo arthrodesis have higher reoperation rates and incidence of postoperative complications than those who undergo LRTI. Thus, although arthrodesis may be a better operation for patients who require high pinch strength, surgeons should also consider the higher complication compared with LRTI.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.
关节融合术以及韧带重建和肌腱植入术(LRTI)是治疗拇指腕掌关节(CMC)骨关节炎的常用手术方法。尽管LRTI是最常见的外科治疗方法,但由于报道的优势,也有人进行CMC关节融合术。本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了CMC关节融合术和LRTI之间的差异,以便在外科医生和患者做出治疗决策时提供更充分的信息。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,查找截至2023年8月27日发表的直接比较关节融合术与LRTI治疗拇指CMC关节关节炎的研究。汇总分析比较了视觉模拟量表;手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分;握力;捏力;再次手术率;以及术后并发症发生率。
纳入了6项研究,共描述了285例拇指,其中分别有141例和155例拇指接受了关节融合术和LRTI。视觉模拟量表(标准平均差[SMD],-0.05;95%可信区间,-0.40至0.30;P = 0.78)、手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分(SMD,0.53;95%可信区间,-1.12至2.17;P = 0.53)和握力(SMD,-0.67;95%可信区间,-1.85至0.51;P = 0.27)在两组之间无差异。与LRTI组相比,关节融合术组的捏力明显更高(SMD,0.61;95%可信区间,0.32 - 0.90)、再次手术率(优势比,8.02;95%可信区间,2.00 - 32.16)和术后并发症发生率(优势比,2.08;95%可信区间,1.11 - 3.91;I² = 0%)。
与LRTI相比,CMC关节融合术的捏力更好。然而,在功能评分和握力方面未观察到显著差异。接受关节融合术的患者比接受LRTI的患者有更高的再次手术率和术后并发症发生率。因此,尽管对于需要高捏力的患者,关节融合术可能是更好的手术方法,但外科医生也应考虑到与LRTI相比更高的并发症发生率。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性II级。